From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Cezary Rojewski" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
"Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mohan Kumar D" <mkumard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream_reset() to use macros
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:07:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lepugy85.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9677f39a-5297-bb1c-d4e3-62484ec1cf25@nvidia.com>
On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:52:01 +0200,
Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>
> On 05/10/2022 13:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> HDA playback is failing on -next for various Tegra boards. Bisect is
> >> point to this commit and reverting it fixes the problem. I was a bit
> >> puzzled why this change is causing a problem, but looking closer there
> >> is a difference between the previous code that was calling
> >> snd_hdac_stream_readb() and the new code that is calling
> >> snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(). The function snd_hdac_stream_readb()
> >> calls snd_hdac_aligned_mmio() is see if the device has an aligned MMIO
> >> which Tegra does and then would call snd_hdac_aligned_read(). However,
> >> now the code always call readb() and this is breaking Tegra.
> >>
> >> So it is either necessary to update snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll() to
> >> handle this or revert this change.
> >
> > Does the patch below work?
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> > -- 8< --
> > --- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> > +++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> > @@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
> > #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
> > snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
> > #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> > - readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> > - delay_us, timeout_us)
> > + read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
> > + false, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
> > #define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> > readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> > delay_us, timeout_us)
>
>
> Amazingly it does not work. I would have thought that would, but it
> does not. I am a bit puzzled by that?
Interesting, it must be a subtle difference.
What about passing true? It seems that the original code has the
udelay(3) before the loop.
Takashi
-- 8< --
--- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
+++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
@@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
#define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
#define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
- readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
- delay_us, timeout_us)
+ read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
+ true, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
#define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
delay_us, timeout_us)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220818141517.109280-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
[not found] ` <20220818141517.109280-3-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
2022-10-05 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream_reset() to use macros Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 12:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2022-10-05 13:52 ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 14:07 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2022-10-05 14:26 ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-05 14:47 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-10-05 20:16 ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-06 8:45 ` Jon Hunter
2022-10-07 8:49 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lepugy85.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).