From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/639] 4.19.99-stable review Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:07:51 +0000 Message-ID: <8a782263-aca3-3846-12a0-4eb21f015894@nvidia.com> References: <20200124093047.008739095@linuxfoundation.org> <23f2a904-3351-4a75-aaaf-2623dc55d114@nvidia.com> <20200124173659.GD3166016@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200124173659.GD3166016@kroah.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 24/01/2020 17:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 02:50:05PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 24/01/2020 09:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.99 release. >>> There are 639 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:26:29 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.99-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >>> ------------- >>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: >> >> ... >> >>> Rafael J. Wysocki >>> PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle >> >> The above commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra124 Jetson-TK1. >> Reverting this on top of v4.19.99-rc1 fixes the issue. > > This is also in the 4.14 queue, so should I drop it there too? I did not see any failures with the same board on that branch, so I would say no, but odd that it only fails here. It was failing for me 100% so I would have expected to see if there too if it was a problem. Jon -- nvpublic