public inbox for linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/tegra: dpaux: Fix always-failing probing of the driver
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:56:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d467b07-c5cb-061f-d893-2c2c813877d3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924133629.GD23547@ulmo>

On 9/24/18 4:36 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 03:40:35PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 9/24/18 3:32 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24/09/18 12:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:42:41PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> Some of definitions in the code changed the meaning, unfortunately one
>>>>> place missed the change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 0751bb5c44fe ("drm/tegra: dpaux: Add pinctrl support")
>>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have HW to test DPAUX driver, apparently it has been broken for
>>>>> 2+ years now. There is also a known issue on with the DPAUX driver that
>>>>> prevents it from probing, that was discussed on the #tegra IRC. Thierry,
>>>>> please take a closer look at this driver and test it thoroughly, it has
>>>>> some obvious problems.
>>>>>
>>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c | 2 +-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> It's odd that you claim that the driver is always failing probe and at
>>>> the same time you say that you don't have hardware to test the driver.
>>>> =)
>>>>
>>>> I know for a fact that this driver does not usually fail because it is
>>>> required on all recent chips (Tegra210 and later) to drive HDMI, which
>>>> we support on all boards, so it is indeed thoroughly tested.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
>>>>> index d84e81ff36ad..ba5681fab73b 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dpaux.c
>>>>> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static int tegra_dpaux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>    	 * is no possibility to perform the I2C mode configuration in the
>>>>>    	 * HDMI path.
>>>>>    	 */
>>>>> -	err = tegra_dpaux_pad_config(dpaux, DPAUX_HYBRID_PADCTL_MODE_I2C);
>>>>> +	err = tegra_dpaux_pad_config(dpaux, DPAUX_PADCTL_FUNC_I2C);
>>>>>    	if (err < 0)
>>>>>    		return err;
>>>>
>>>> If you look at the definitions of both DPAUX_HYBRID_PADCTL_MODE_I2C and
>>>> DPAUX_PADCTL_FUNC_I2C, you'll see that both are actually the same, which
>>>> is a good explanation for why the driver performs flawlessly.
>>>>
>>>> That said, your change is obviously correct. I've applied it, but since
>>>> it doesn't actually fix anything, and doesn't change anything from a
>>>> binary point of view, I've removed the Fixes: and Cc: stable tags.
>>>
>>> Did you change the subject for the patch because as you mentioned it
>>> does not seem related to the change?
>>>
>>> Otherwise for the fix you can have my ...
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> The dpaux driver has been working fine for me on Tegra210 Smaug when
>>> using the pins for I2C and I have not seen any probing problems.
>>
>> Guy with nickname "vlado" said on the IRC that the panel stopped to work on
>> T124 chromebook since 4.16 kernel, reverting commit [0] helps.
>>
>> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c?id=17ab7806de0c10d27cdbda8ef57ca680bdd24315
> 
> I'm pretty sure that's something that we fixed, but I'll have to check.
> 
> Is this patch reported to help with that issue, or where's the
> connection?

Reverting of the patch was reported to help with the problem. Check the IRC 
history, you can also just ask the original reporter for more details on #tegra. 
IIUC, the DPAUX driver probing is getting deferred because regulator isn't ready 
during of the first invocation and then for some reason driver is never getting 
re-probed.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21 11:42 [PATCH v1] drm/tegra: dpaux: Fix always-failing probing of the driver Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-24 11:59 ` Thierry Reding
2018-09-24 12:32   ` Jon Hunter
2018-09-24 12:40     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-24 13:36       ` Thierry Reding
2018-09-24 13:56         ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2018-09-24 14:15           ` Thierry Reding
2018-09-24 14:04         ` Thierry Reding
2018-09-24 19:15           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2018-09-24 13:30     ` Thierry Reding
2018-09-24 12:34   ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d467b07-c5cb-061f-d893-2c2c813877d3@gmail.com \
    --to=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox