Re: [PATCH 22/25] ARM: tegra: Move I2C clock frequency to bus nodes

[Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2621 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 07:08:22PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 10.12.2021 18:01, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:57:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 09.12.2021 20:33, Thierry Reding пишет:
> >>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >>>
> >>> The "clock-frequency" property for an I2C controller needs to be
> >>> specified at the bus level.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-asus-nexus7-grouper.dtsi | 3 ++-
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-asus-nexus7-tilapia.dtsi | 4 ++--
> >>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> The clock-frequency is specified in the parent-common N7 DTSI, NAK.
> >>
> >> There is already patch from David that removes the clock-frequency from
> >> NFC node [1], please use it.
> >>
> >> Please never again rewrite the preexisting patches, this makes you look odd.
> > 
> > Again, please don't make this into something it isn't.
> > 
> >> I suggest to collect *all* patches (not only your own) into single
> >> for-next branch, resolving all conflicts, making sure that you don't
> >> duplicate the effort and letting it all to be tested before it will hit
> >> the bus.
> > 
> > You know, if you guys communicated better over existing channels or
> > actually let me know of what's going on then a lot of this could've been
> > avoided. I don't have visibility into what you're all up to, so I can't
> > take that into account.
> 
> All the messages from me and David are in yours email inbox and on
> #tegra IRC. You have the complete visibility. Either you don't have time
> to take a look and then forget about it or I don't know what's the problem.
> 
> > If I happen to start working on something that someone else is also
> > doing in their corner, that's by accident, not because I have bad
> > intentions or because "I want to do everything myself", or whatever
> > other reason you keep coming up with.
> > 
> > Stop insinuating things that aren't true.
> 
> My point is that you're ignoring the existing patches. It may not look
> like a big problem to you since you can apply patches directly and I
> understand that own patches are always the most important ones, but this
> is a problem for everyone around you.

I wish my own patches were always the important ones. If you care you
can take a look at how many of my own patches actually make it upstream
each release. My patch stack regularly grows beyond a couple of hundred
because I don't always prioritize my own work.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]