Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: tegra124-emc: Fix potential memory leak

[Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1302 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 09:41:24AM +0000, Yuan Can wrote:
> The tegra and tegra needs to be freed in the error handling path, otherwise
> it will be leaked.
> 
> Fixes: 2db04f16b589 ("clk: tegra: Add EMC clock driver")
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-emc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-emc.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-emc.c
> index 219c80653dbd..2a6db0434281 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-emc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124-emc.c
> @@ -464,6 +464,7 @@ static int load_timings_from_dt(struct tegra_clk_emc *tegra,
>  		err = load_one_timing_from_dt(tegra, timing, child);
>  		if (err) {
>  			of_node_put(child);
> +			kfree(tegra->timings);
>  			return err;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ struct clk *tegra124_clk_register_emc(void __iomem *base, struct device_node *np
>  		err = load_timings_from_dt(tegra, node, node_ram_code);
>  		if (err) {
>  			of_node_put(node);
> +			kfree(tegra);
>  			return ERR_PTR(err);
>  		}
>  	}

Don't we need another kfree(tegra) in case the clk_register() fails? We
could do that as a follow-up and this patch isn't wrong, so:

Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]