From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED3DEE4996 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 12:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235059AbjHUMr0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:47:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54018 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235061AbjHUMr0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:47:26 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C98D4CF; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 05:47:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1692622041; x=1724158041; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WT0CppAYh4JWZnBJRGCct2icAFxfvQD2ozg66ant7VA=; b=PehRDXWm18NvThT8+b+DoHE8aXSo/OmmqEdoLxS/3H076MREWIb0k1rw yWw0XmQXThQ/Tgbqz5oZN6wNs+fuFrYyZJqkhujFrEFpiid+VaeU6m8oX e19Nb7tJFQWER4sXZDIFcbmvaJbjfnQ00Y9PIyUDQKofRkxWO8BZDHx4J QAc52GemUK8KNcdvT+kIq922T/n9SCpMiITXy24ZnZbwCBfqcTW6XBY37 9iYHntD6GWqQ1p4/ZKkWpVg1nKVVG46hs/WGkMFy2s/OMmGQ9YEaxqf2S PgjAnOmy/La5PyXqzXsiMa2I2hVEU+WXha2mopN9N1IGdwvSfeztaegjo A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10809"; a="353895300" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,190,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="353895300" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Aug 2023 05:47:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10809"; a="859460788" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,190,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="859460788" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2023 05:47:16 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qY4JO-00ES7D-37; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:47:14 +0300 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:47:14 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Kartik Cc: arnd@arndb.de, digetx@gmail.com, frank.li@vivo.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, pdeschrijver@nvidia.com, petlozup@nvidia.com, pshete@nvidia.com, robh@kernel.org, stefank@nvidia.com, sumitg@nvidia.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, windhl@126.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] soc/tegra: fuse: Add support for Tegra241 Message-ID: References: <20230821114033.4446-1-kkartik@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230821114033.4446-1-kkartik@nvidia.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:10:33PM +0530, Kartik wrote: > On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 18:10 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 03:00:28PM +0530, Kartik wrote: ... > >> case TEGRA234: > >> fuse->soc = &tegra234_fuse_soc; > >> break; > >> +#endif > >> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_241_SOC) > >> + case TEGRA241: > >> + fuse->soc = &tegra241_fuse_soc; > >> + break; > >> #endif > > > >Have you tried --patience when formatting patches? > >Does it help them to look better? > > No, I did not use --patience flag while formatting the patches. > Shall I post the next patch set using it? Do you see the difference in the output? If yes, definitely use it. Otherwise it's recommended to use anyway. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko