From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: chipidea: Simplify Tegra DMA alignment code
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:53:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZScZWFJCCMr7oWwX@orome.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0d917d492b1f91ee0019e68b8e8bca9c585393f.1695934946.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4695 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:06:03PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> The USB host on Tegra3 works with 32-bit alignment. Previous code tried
> to align the buffer, but it did align the wrapper struct instead, so
> the buffer was at a constant offset of 8 bytes (two pointers) from
> expected alignment. Since kmalloc() guarantees at least 8-byte
> alignment already, the alignment-extending is removed.
>
> Fixes: fc53d5279094 ("usb: chipidea: tegra: Support host mode")
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
> ---
> drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c | 45 +++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c
> index abddd39d1ff1..0cce19208370 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,7 @@ struct ehci_ci_priv {
> };
>
> struct ci_hdrc_dma_aligned_buffer {
> - void *kmalloc_ptr;
> - void *old_xfer_buffer;
> + void *original_buffer;
> u8 data[];
> };
>
> @@ -380,60 +379,52 @@ static int ci_ehci_bus_suspend(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void ci_hdrc_free_dma_aligned_buffer(struct urb *urb)
> +static void ci_hdrc_free_dma_aligned_buffer(struct urb *urb, bool copy_back)
> {
> struct ci_hdrc_dma_aligned_buffer *temp;
> - size_t length;
>
> if (!(urb->transfer_flags & URB_ALIGNED_TEMP_BUFFER))
> return;
> + urb->transfer_flags &= ~URB_ALIGNED_TEMP_BUFFER;
This threw me off a bit until I realized it was already there
previously, just in a different place. Is there a particular reason why
this is moved?
Regardless, this looks fine, so:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> temp = container_of(urb->transfer_buffer,
> struct ci_hdrc_dma_aligned_buffer, data);
> + urb->transfer_buffer = temp->original_buffer;
> +
> + if (copy_back && usb_urb_dir_in(urb)) {
> + size_t length;
>
> - if (usb_urb_dir_in(urb)) {
> if (usb_pipeisoc(urb->pipe))
> length = urb->transfer_buffer_length;
> else
> length = urb->actual_length;
>
> - memcpy(temp->old_xfer_buffer, temp->data, length);
> + memcpy(temp->original_buffer, temp->data, length);
> }
> - urb->transfer_buffer = temp->old_xfer_buffer;
> - kfree(temp->kmalloc_ptr);
>
> - urb->transfer_flags &= ~URB_ALIGNED_TEMP_BUFFER;
> + kfree(temp);
> }
>
> static int ci_hdrc_alloc_dma_aligned_buffer(struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flags)
> {
> - struct ci_hdrc_dma_aligned_buffer *temp, *kmalloc_ptr;
> - const unsigned int ci_hdrc_usb_dma_align = 32;
> - size_t kmalloc_size;
> + struct ci_hdrc_dma_aligned_buffer *temp;
>
> if (urb->num_sgs || urb->sg || urb->transfer_buffer_length == 0)
> return 0;
> - if (!((uintptr_t)urb->transfer_buffer & (ci_hdrc_usb_dma_align - 1)) && !(urb->transfer_buffer_length & 3))
> + if (IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)urb->transfer_buffer, 4)
> + && IS_ALIGNED(urb->transfer_buffer_length, 4))
> return 0;
>
> - /* Allocate a buffer with enough padding for alignment */
> - kmalloc_size = ALIGN(urb->transfer_buffer_length, 4) +
> - sizeof(struct ci_hdrc_dma_aligned_buffer) +
> - ci_hdrc_usb_dma_align - 1;
> -
> - kmalloc_ptr = kmalloc(kmalloc_size, mem_flags);
> - if (!kmalloc_ptr)
> + temp = kmalloc(sizeof(*temp) + ALIGN(urb->transfer_buffer_length, 4), mem_flags);
> + if (!temp)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* Position our struct dma_aligned_buffer such that data is aligned */
> - temp = PTR_ALIGN(kmalloc_ptr + 1, ci_hdrc_usb_dma_align) - 1;
> - temp->kmalloc_ptr = kmalloc_ptr;
> - temp->old_xfer_buffer = urb->transfer_buffer;
> if (usb_urb_dir_out(urb))
> memcpy(temp->data, urb->transfer_buffer,
> urb->transfer_buffer_length);
> +
> + temp->original_buffer = urb->transfer_buffer;
> urb->transfer_buffer = temp->data;
> -
> urb->transfer_flags |= URB_ALIGNED_TEMP_BUFFER;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -450,7 +441,7 @@ static int ci_hdrc_map_urb_for_dma(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb,
>
> ret = usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma(hcd, urb, mem_flags);
> if (ret)
> - ci_hdrc_free_dma_aligned_buffer(urb);
> + ci_hdrc_free_dma_aligned_buffer(urb, false);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -458,7 +449,7 @@ static int ci_hdrc_map_urb_for_dma(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb,
> static void ci_hdrc_unmap_urb_for_dma(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb)
> {
> usb_hcd_unmap_urb_for_dma(hcd, urb);
> - ci_hdrc_free_dma_aligned_buffer(urb);
> + ci_hdrc_free_dma_aligned_buffer(urb, true);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> --
> 2.39.2
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 21:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] usb: chipidea: An USB DMA fix + cleanups for Tegra Michał Mirosław
2023-09-28 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: chipidea: Simplify Tegra DMA alignment code Michał Mirosław
2023-10-11 21:53 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2023-10-12 14:28 ` Peter Chen
2023-10-12 21:20 ` Michał Mirosław
2023-09-28 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: chipidea: Fix DMA overwrite for Tegra Michał Mirosław
2023-10-11 21:51 ` Thierry Reding
2023-10-12 14:28 ` Peter Chen
2023-09-28 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] usb: chipidea: tegra: Consistently use dev_err_probe() Michał Mirosław
2023-10-11 21:53 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZScZWFJCCMr7oWwX@orome.fritz.box \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=peter.chen@kernel.org \
--cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox