From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: core: Don't use regulators as supplies until the parent is bound
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a14455c8-f3a0-985d-cc65-16c4d91dfa07@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484154898-4342-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 11/01/17 17:14, Jon Hunter wrote:
> When regulators are successfully registered, we check to see if the
> regulator is a supply for any other registered regulator and if so
> add the new regulator as the supply for the existing regulator(s).
>
> Some devices, such as Power Management ICs, may register a series of
> regulators when probed and there are cases where one of the regulators
> may fail to register and defer the probing of the parent device. In this
> case any successfully registered regulators would be unregistered so
> that they can be re-registered at some time later when the probe is
> attempted again. However, if one of the regulators that was registered
> was added as a supply to another registered regulator (that did not
> belong to the same parent device), then this supply regulator was
> unregister again because the parent device is probe deferred, then a
> regulator could be holding an invalid reference to a supply regulator
> that has been unregistered. This will lead to a system crash if that
> regulator is then used.
>
> Although it would be possible to check when unregistering a regulator
> if any other regulator in the system is using it as a supply, it still
> may not be possible to remove it as a supply if this other regulator is
> in use. Therefore, fix this by preventing any regulator from adding
> another regulator as a supply if the parent device for the supply
> regulator has not been bound and if the parent device for the supply
> and the regulator are different. This will allow a parent device that is
> registering regulators to be probe deferred and ensure that none of the
> regulators it has registered are used as supplies for any other
> regulator from another device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
> Changes since V1:
> - Updated patch per Mark's input to only prevent resolving the supply
> if the supply's parent is different from the regulator's and the
> supply's parent device is not bound.
> - Added comment.
>
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 04baac9a165b..00466a82c3ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -1553,6 +1553,19 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If the supply's parent device is not the same as the
> + * regulator's parent device, then ensure the parent device
> + * is bound before we resolve the supply, in case the parent
> + * device get probe deferred and unregisters the supply.
> + */
Ugh ... looks like I screwed up the formatting here. Also ...
s/get/gets
Resending ...
Jon
--
nvpublic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 17:14 [PATCH V2] regulator: core: Don't use regulators as supplies until the parent is bound Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1484154898-4342-1-git-send-email-jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-11 17:30 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a14455c8-f3a0-985d-cc65-16c4d91dfa07@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox