public inbox for linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>,
	perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
	pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, rlokhande@nvidia.com,
	sharadg@nvidia.com, mkumard@nvidia.com,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda/tegra: enable clock during probe
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 11:42:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae87a09f-2922-9a9d-3ad3-e9abe7fb20c2@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548414418-5785-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com>


On 25/01/2019 11:06, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> If CONFIG_PM is disabled or runtime PM calls are forbidden, the clocks
> will not be ON. This could cause issue during probe, where hda init
> setup is done. This patch enables clocks unconditionally during probe.
> 
> Along with above, follwoing changes are done.
>   * enable runtime PM before exiting from probe work. This helps to avoid
>     usage of pm_runtime_get_sync/pm_runtime_put() in probe work.
>   * hda_tegra_disable_clocks() is moved out of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP check.
>   * runtime PM callbacks moved out of CONFIG_PM check
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ravindra Lokhande <rlokhande@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c
> index c8d18dc..ba6175f 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,6 @@ static int hda_tegra_enable_clocks(struct hda_tegra *data)
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static void hda_tegra_disable_clocks(struct hda_tegra *data)
>  {
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(data->hda2hdmi_clk);
> @@ -227,6 +226,7 @@ static void hda_tegra_disable_clocks(struct hda_tegra *data)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(data->hda_clk);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  /*
>   * power management
>   */
> @@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ static int hda_tegra_resume(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  static int hda_tegra_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct snd_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -283,7 +282,7 @@ static int hda_tegra_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	rc = hda_tegra_enable_clocks(hda);
> -	if (rc != 0)
> +	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  	if (chip && chip->running) {
>  		hda_tegra_init(hda);
> @@ -292,7 +291,6 @@ static int hda_tegra_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>  
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops hda_tegra_pm = {
>  	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(hda_tegra_suspend, hda_tegra_resume)
> @@ -551,9 +549,9 @@ static int hda_tegra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, card);
>  
> -	pm_runtime_enable(hda->dev);
> -	if (!azx_has_pm_runtime(chip))
> -		pm_runtime_forbid(hda->dev);
> +	err = hda_tegra_enable_clocks(hda);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_free;
>  
>  	schedule_work(&hda->probe_work);
>  
> @@ -571,7 +569,6 @@ static void hda_tegra_probe_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hda->dev);
>  	int err;
>  
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(hda->dev);
>  	err = hda_tegra_first_init(chip, pdev);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		goto out_free;
> @@ -592,8 +589,15 @@ static void hda_tegra_probe_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	chip->running = 1;
>  	snd_hda_set_power_save(&chip->bus, power_save * 1000);
>  
> +	/* set device state as active */
> +	if (pm_runtime_set_active(hda->dev) < 0)
> +		goto out_free;
> +	/* enable runtime PM */
> +	pm_runtime_enable(hda->dev);
> +	if (!azx_has_pm_runtime(chip))
> +		pm_runtime_forbid(hda->dev);
> +
>   out_free:
> -	pm_runtime_put(hda->dev);
>  	return; /* no error return from async probe */
>  }
>  
> @@ -603,6 +607,10 @@ static int hda_tegra_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	ret = snd_card_free(dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev));
>  	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev)) {
> +		hda_tegra_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> +		pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
> +	}

I think that we need to be consistent in the above with what is done in
the probe. If in the probe we call hda_tegra_enable_clocks(), then here
we should call hda_tegra_disable_clocks(). However, my preference is
still to all hda_tegra_runtime_resume() in probe and then leave the
above as-is. Let's see what everyone else thinks.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-25 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-25 11:06 [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda/tegra: enable clock during probe Sameer Pujar
2019-01-25 11:42 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2019-01-25 12:19   ` Sameer Pujar
2019-01-25 13:15     ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-30 12:45 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-30 16:40   ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-31  9:36     ` Sameer Pujar
2019-01-31 11:05     ` Thierry Reding
2019-01-31 11:21       ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-31 11:46         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-31 11:50           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-31 11:59           ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-31 12:10             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-31 14:21               ` Sameer Pujar
2019-01-31 14:30               ` Thierry Reding
2019-01-31 23:24                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-04  8:16                   ` Sameer Pujar
2019-02-04  8:51                     ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 10:04                     ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-04 10:13                       ` Takashi Iwai
2019-02-05 11:34                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-04  8:45                   ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04  9:53                     ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-04 11:05                       ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 12:03                         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-02-04 14:00                           ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 14:28                             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-02-04 16:17                               ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 18:46                                 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-02-05 11:52                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae87a09f-2922-9a9d-3ad3-e9abe7fb20c2@nvidia.com \
    --to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rlokhande@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sharadg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=spujar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox