On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 01:50:18PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Replace the pointer-based map allocation with a flexible array
> member and use struct_size() for allocation. This simplifies
> the code and avoid an extra allocation.
> 
> Assisted-by: opencode:big-pickle
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/tegra/tegra210_adx.c | 12 ++++--------
>  sound/soc/tegra/tegra210_adx.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra210_adx.c b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra210_adx.c
> index 9175598b52a7..d607ba4233b6 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/tegra/tegra210_adx.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/tegra/tegra210_adx.c
> @@ -677,11 +677,13 @@ static int tegra210_adx_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	void __iomem *regs;
>  	int err, i;
>  
> -	adx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*adx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	adx = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> +			   struct_size(adx, map, soc_data->ram_depth * TEGRA_ADX_SLOTS_PER_WORD),
> +			   GFP_KERNEL);

This is slightly hideous. Maybe add a temporary "count" variable for
readability?

Either way, though, this looks correct:

Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>