From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] clk: tegra: Implement Tegra210 EMC clock Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:21:11 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20200310152003.2945170-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20200310152003.2945170-4-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20200323110023.GB3883508@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200323110023.GB3883508@ulmo> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Jon Hunter , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Joseph Lo , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org 23.03.2020 14:00, Thierry Reding пишет: ... >>> + if (!provider || !provider->configs || provider->num_configs == 0) >>> + return -EINVAL; >> >> Why all these checks are needed? I don't think it ever could fail, >> couldn't it? > > This could fail if no EMC provider is attached, which happens, for > example, when the EMC driver is not loaded. Requesting EMC clock should return EPROBE_DEFER until provider is available. Please see tegra20_clk_src_onecell_get for the example. Tegra124 should do the same, BTW.