From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:52:10 +0300 Message-ID: References: <6f07e5c8-7916-7ea2-2fe7-d05f8f011471@nvidia.com> <77a31b2f-f525-ba9e-f1ae-2b474465bde4@gmail.com> <470b4de4-e98a-1bdc-049e-6259ad603507@nvidia.com> <79f6560e-dbb5-0ae1-49f8-cf1cd95396ec@nvidia.com> <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding , Wolfram Sang Cc: Jon Hunter , Laxman Dewangan , Manikanta Maddireddy , Vidya Sagar , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org 27.04.2020 10:48, Thierry Reding пишет: ... >> Maybe but all these other problems appear to have existed for sometime >> now. We need to fix all, but for the moment we need to figure out what's >> best for v5.7. > > To me it doesn't sound like we have a good handle on what exactly is > going on here and we're mostly just poking around. > > And even if things weren't working quite properly before, it sounds to > me like this patch actually made things worse. There is a plenty of time to work on the proper fix now. To me it sounds like you're giving up on fixing the root of the problem, sorry.