From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Reichl <hias@horus.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@ziswiler.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:03:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1e41ed2-da7c-b46c-bc6d-64cf3e536771@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5164c93-8be8-1c3d-9415-c895da6ad622@nvidia.com>
On 08/01/2019 10:50, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Kuninori,
>
> On 08/01/2019 02:25, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jon
>>
>>> I have been looking at this again recently. I see this issue occurring
>>> all the time when the sound drivers are built as kernel modules and
>>> probing the sound card is deferred until the codec driver has been loaded.
>>>
>>> Commit daecf46ee0e5 ("ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_dai_link_component for
>>> platform") appears to introduce the problem because now we allocate the
>>> 'snd_soc_dai_link_component' structure for the platform we attempt to
>>> register the soundcard but we never clear the freed pointer on failure.
>>> Therefore, we only actually allocate it the first time. There is no easy
>>> way to clear this pointer for the memory allocated because this is done
>>> before the dai-links have been added to the list of dai-links for the
>>> soundcard.
>>>
>>> I don't see an easy solution that will be 100% robust unless you do opt
>>> for copying all the dai-link info from the platform (but this is
>>> probably not a trivial fix).
>>>
>>> Do you envision a fix any time soon, or should we be updating all the
>>> machine drivers to populate the platform snd_soc_dai_link_component so
>>> that it is handled by the machine drivers are not the core?
>>
>> Thank you for pointing it.
>> Indeed it is mess.
>> I think coping info is nice idea,
>> but it is not easy so far, and it uses much memory...
>>
>> I didn't test this, but can below patch solve your issue ?
>
> I will give it a try and let you know.
Yes so this does workaround the problem. However, per my previous
comments, I would like to explore whether it is necessary to allocate
the platform link component or if it can be static.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-08 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-18 11:18 [PATCH v1 0/3] ASoC: last minute fixes Marcel Ziswiler
2018-10-18 11:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] ASoC: tegra_sgtl5000: fix device_node refcounting Marcel Ziswiler
2018-10-18 11:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix trivial checkpatch issues Marcel Ziswiler
2018-10-19 12:26 ` Applied "ASoC: soc-core: fix trivial checkpatch issues" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2018-10-19 12:34 ` Mark Brown
2018-10-18 11:18 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement Marcel Ziswiler
2018-10-19 10:22 ` Jon Hunter
2018-10-21 11:23 ` Mark Brown
2018-12-18 17:40 ` Matthias Reichl
2019-01-03 16:42 ` [alsa-devel] " Jon Hunter
2019-01-08 2:25 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-01-08 10:50 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-08 12:03 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2019-01-08 15:48 ` [alsa-devel] " Jon Hunter
2019-01-08 16:09 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-09 1:51 ` [alsa-devel] " Kuninori Morimoto
2019-01-09 11:03 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-09 12:53 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-09 14:11 ` [alsa-devel] " Jon Hunter
2019-01-09 14:14 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-10 1:16 ` [alsa-devel] " Kuninori Morimoto
2019-01-10 3:46 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-01-10 10:56 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-11 0:52 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-01-11 8:41 ` [alsa-devel] " Jon Hunter
2019-01-11 8:51 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-01-11 9:15 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-14 23:02 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 15:26 ` [alsa-devel] " Jon Hunter
2019-01-15 18:07 ` Matthias Reichl
2019-01-08 15:33 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1e41ed2-da7c-b46c-bc6d-64cf3e536771@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hias@horus.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
--cc=marcel@ziswiler.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox