From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] clk: tegra: Implement Tegra210 EMC clock Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:14:17 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20200310152003.2945170-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20200310152003.2945170-4-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20200323110531.GD3883508@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200323110531.GD3883508@ulmo> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Jon Hunter , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Joseph Lo , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org 23.03.2020 14:05, Thierry Reding пишет: ... >>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra210_emc_pm_ops = { >>> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra210_emc_suspend, tegra210_emc_resume) >>> +}; >> What about to use the default suspend/resume level? > > I don't understand. This is already the default suspend/resume level, > isn't it? Please use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS, for clarity.