From: "zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<robert.moore@intel.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
<treding@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <sashal@nvidia.com>,
<vsethi@nvidia.com>, <ksitaraman@nvidia.com>,
<sanjayc@nvidia.com>, <bbasu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] Support Autonomous Selection mode in cppc_cpufreq
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 18:06:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da5d18c7-cf09-4956-ad9c-231b12cc0267@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e58a20f8-e8bf-409c-a878-af2bd3c7d243@nvidia.com>
On 2025/2/21 21:14, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>
>
> On 19/02/25 00:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> There seems to be some quite fundamental disagreement on how this
>> should be done, so I'm afraid I cannot do much about it ATM.
>>
>> Please agree on a common approach and come back to me when you are ready.
>>
>> Sending two concurrent patchsets under confusingly similar names again
>> and again isn't particularly helpful.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thank you for looking into this.
>
> Hi Lifeng,
>
> As per the discussion, we can make the driver future extensible and
> also can optimize the register read/write access.
>
> I gave some thought and below is my proposal.
>
> 1) Pick 'Patch 1-7' from your patch series [1] which optimize API's
> to read/write a cpc register.
'patch 1-7' in [1] doesn't conflicts with [2], so can be reviewed and
applied separately. I would follow this up in that series.
>
> 2) Pick my patches in [2]:
> - Patch 1-4: Keep all cpc registers together under acpi_cppc sysfs.
> Also, update existing API's to read/write regs in batch.
> - Patch 5: Creates 'cppc_cpufreq_epp_driver' instance for booting
> all CPU's in Auto mode and set registers with right values.
> They can be updated after boot from sysfs to change hints to HW.
> I can use the optimized API's from [1] where required in [2].
>
> Let me know if you are okay with this proposal.
> I can also send an updated patch series with all the patches combined?
As mentioned above, 'patch 1-7' in [1] can be reviewed and applied
separately. No need to be combined with other patches.
About how to support auto selection mode in cppc_cpufreq, I think we need
to sort out usecases, scenarios, and requirements from both of us before we
disscus and agree on a design to implement. I am currently working on it
and will sent out my thoughts later.
Regards,
Lifeng
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250206131428.3261578-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250211103737.447704-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>
> Regards,
> Sumit Gupta
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-22 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 10:37 [Patch 0/5] Support Autonomous Selection mode in cppc_cpufreq Sumit Gupta
2025-02-11 10:37 ` [Patch 1/5] ACPI: CPPC: add read perf ctrls api and rename few existing Sumit Gupta
2025-02-12 8:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-12 8:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-11 10:37 ` [Patch 2/5] ACPI: CPPC: expand macro to create store acpi_cppc sysfs node Sumit Gupta
2025-02-11 10:37 ` [Patch 3/5] ACPI: CPPC: support updating epp, auto_sel and {min|max_perf} from sysfs Sumit Gupta
2025-02-24 10:24 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-03-14 13:11 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-02-11 10:37 ` [Patch 4/5] Documentation: ACPI: add autonomous mode ctrls info in cppc_sysfs.txt Sumit Gupta
2025-02-11 10:37 ` [Patch 5/5] cpufreq: CPPC: Add cppc_cpufreq_epp instance for Autonomous mode Sumit Gupta
2025-02-12 9:27 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-11 10:44 ` [Patch 0/5] Support Autonomous Selection mode in cppc_cpufreq Viresh Kumar
2025-02-11 12:01 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-02-11 14:08 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-02-12 10:52 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-02-14 7:08 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-02-18 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-21 13:14 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-02-22 10:06 ` zhenglifeng (A) [this message]
2025-02-26 10:22 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-03-14 12:48 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-04-01 13:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-04-19 7:44 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-04-27 6:23 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-04-30 15:00 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da5d18c7-cf09-4956-ad9c-231b12cc0267@huawei.com \
--to=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sashal@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox