Re: bq24735 charger and ac-detect

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On 15/12/16 14:04, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 15/12/16 12:04, Peter Rosin wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>                               The only other option is to add another
>>> property called something like 'ti,ac-detect-override-pol' to specify
>>> the polarity you want.
>>
>> How is that helping? It's no different that just saying active-low for
>> boards that do not invert ACOK (which is what I currently do in my dts,
>> but I hate doing it since it doesn't match dt docs and is therefore just
>> wrong).
> 
> By providing a means for the user to specify the polarity for their
> board. Of course the documentation would need to be updated as well. I
> think all solutions will be ugly if we need to preserve compatibility.
> 
>>> To be honest, I am not sure how this type of thing is normally handled.
>>> So probably best to put together a patch with whatever option you feel
>>> best and explain why this is needed and see what the dev-tree folks say.
>>
>> I suspect that at the end of the day documentation is less important than
>> regressions. But if there are more than one implementation of the same
>> spec and Linux is not following it, it's kind of harsh to change the spec
>> to match Linux. I doubt that there are any other users in this case though,
>> but what do I know?
>>
>> I'll send a patch re-documenting ti,ac-detect-gpios to specify AC absence
>> instead of AC presence, let's see what the dt people thinks...
> 
> Fine with me and of course that works for Tegra, but how does that
> ultimately help you? How do you tell the driver to use active-high
> instead of the default which is not active-low?

s/which is not/which is now/

Jon

-- 
nvpublic