From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sumit Gupta Subject: Re: [TEGRA194_CPUFREQ PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: Add t194 ccplex compatible and bpmp property Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 21:44:22 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1594649209-29394-1-git-send-email-sumitg@nvidia.com> <1594649209-29394-2-git-send-email-sumitg@nvidia.com> <20200713164214.GA341271@bogus> <70a0a8ee-b79a-2a05-5150-2ee0faaf2730@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Thierry Reding , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jon Hunter , Timo Alho , "open list:THERMAL" , linux-tegra , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , bbasu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Mikko Perttunen , Sumit Gupta List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org >>> >>> The cpus.yaml binding documents what's in 'cpu' nodes, not 'cpus' >>> node. AIUI, the latter is what you want. You should do your own schema >>> file here. >>> >> Do you mean to change existing file name from 'cpus.yaml' to 'cpu.yaml' >> and create new 'cpus.yaml' file? >> I think it's better to incorporate the change in existing 'cpus.yaml' >> file to keep both cpu@X and cpus node details together. Please suggest. > > No, I'm suggesting you create nvidia,tegra194-ccplex.yaml. > Have posted new version of only this patch with new schema file. Please review. Thanks, Sumit