From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
robin.murphy@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, thanu.rangarajan@arm.com,
Michael.Williams@arm.com, treding@nvidia.com,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, mike.leach@linaro.org,
leo.yan@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] perf: arm_cspmu: Add support for ARM CoreSight PMU driver
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:29:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f67bf3b6-c8ba-4134-5772-ce750f4bb4dd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220928201830.45637-2-bwicaksono@nvidia.com>
Hi Besar
On 28/09/2022 21:18, Besar Wicaksono wrote:
> Add support for ARM CoreSight PMU driver framework and interfaces.
> The driver provides generic implementation to operate uncore PMU based
> on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture. The driver also provides interface
> to get vendor/implementation specific information, for example event
> attributes and formating.
>
> The specification used in this implementation can be found below:
> * ACPI Arm Performance Monitoring Unit table:
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0117/latest
> * ARM Coresight PMU architecture:
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0091/latest
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>
Apologies for this late comment. Please find it below.
> ---
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> drivers/perf/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig | 13 +
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile | 6 +
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 1276 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 151 ++++
> 7 files changed, 1450 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 7d1105343bc2..ee31c9159a5b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@ -1212,6 +1212,7 @@ CONFIG_PHY_UNIPHIER_USB3=y
> CONFIG_PHY_TEGRA_XUSB=y
> CONFIG_PHY_AM654_SERDES=m
> CONFIG_PHY_J721E_WIZ=m
> +CONFIG_ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU=y
> CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU=m
> CONFIG_FSL_IMX8_DDR_PMU=m
> CONFIG_QCOM_L2_PMU=y
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> index 1e2d69453771..c94d3601eb48 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/perf/Kconfig
> @@ -192,4 +192,6 @@ config MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU
> Enable perf support for Marvell DDR Performance monitoring
> event on CN10K platform.
>
> +source "drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig"
> +
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/Makefile b/drivers/perf/Makefile
> index 57a279c61df5..3bc9323f0965 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/perf/Makefile
> @@ -20,3 +20,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DMC620_PMU) += arm_dmc620_pmu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_TAD_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MARVELL_CN10K_DDR_PMU) += marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_M1_CPU_PMU) += apple_m1_cpu_pmu.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) += arm_cspmu/
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c2c56ecafccb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Copyright (c) 2022, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES.
> +
> +config ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> + tristate "ARM Coresight Architecture PMU"
> + depends on ACPI
> + depends on ACPI_APMT || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + Provides support for performance monitoring unit (PMU) devices
> + based on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture. Note that this PMU
> + architecture does not have relationship with the ARM CoreSight
> + Self-Hosted Tracing.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cdc3455f74d8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +# Copyright (c) 2022, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES.
> +#
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) += \
> + arm_cspmu.o
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0fa5f29bf1c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1276 @@
> +/* Default event list. */
> +static struct attribute *arm_cspmu_event_attrs[] = {
> + ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, ARM_CSPMU_EVT_CYCLES_DEFAULT),
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute **
> +arm_cspmu_get_event_attrs(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +{
> + return arm_cspmu_event_attrs;
> +}
This would make all the "PMU" instances (which don't implement the
callback) share a non-const array. Could we instead return a copy of
the attrs to avoid drivers messing up with the array ?
The array could be allocated via devm_ on the specific device, thus
it gets cleaned up on the device tear down ?
...
> +static struct attribute **
> +arm_cspmu_get_format_attrs(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +{
> + return arm_cspmu_format_attrs;
> +}
> +
Same as above
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 20:18 [PATCH v5 0/2] perf: ARM CoreSight PMU support Besar Wicaksono
2022-09-28 20:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] perf: arm_cspmu: Add support for ARM CoreSight PMU driver Besar Wicaksono
2022-09-29 8:29 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2022-09-29 14:06 ` Besar Wicaksono
2022-10-06 16:14 ` Besar Wicaksono
2022-10-07 9:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-10-19 14:02 ` Michael Williams (ATG)
2022-09-28 20:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] perf: arm_cspmu: Add support for NVIDIA SCF and MCF attribute Besar Wicaksono
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f67bf3b6-c8ba-4134-5772-ce750f4bb4dd@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=Michael.Williams@arm.com \
--cc=bwicaksono@nvidia.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=thanu.rangarajan@arm.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox