From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:40:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20200324191217.1829-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20200324191217.1829-2-digetx@gmail.com> <1e259e22-c300-663a-e537-18d854e0f478@nvidia.com> <8cd085e1-f9fd-6ec0-9f7a-d5463f176a63@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Dmitry Osipenko , Thierry Reding , Laxman Dewangan , Wolfram Sang , Manikanta Maddireddy , Vidya Sagar Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 21/04/2020 14:25, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 21.04.2020 12:49, Jon Hunter =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > ... >> I can try the above, but I agree it would be best to avoid messing with >> the suspend levels if possible. >=20 > Will be awesome if you could try it and report back the result. >=20 I gave it a try but suspend still fails. Jon --=20 nvpublic