RE: static_branch/jump_label vs branch merging

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: David Malcolm
> Sent: 09 April 2021 14:49
...
> With the caveat that my knowledge of GCC's middle-end is mostly about
> implementing warnings, rather than optimization, I did some
> experimentation, with gcc trunk on x86_64 FWIW.
> 
> Given:
> 
> int __attribute__((pure)) foo(void);
> 
> int t(void)
> {
>   int a;
           = 0;
>   if (foo())
>     a++;
>   if (foo())
>     a++;
>   if (foo())
>     a++;
>   return a;
> }
> 
> At -O1 and above this is optimized to a single call to foo, returning 0
> or 3 accordingly.

Interesting horrid idea.
The code generated for the above should be:
	call	foo
	jz	label
So objtool could find the relocation entries for 'foo'
and use that information to replace the call instruction
(and maybe the jz) with a suitable alternate instruction
sequence.

Although that might end up with a game of 'whack-a-mole'
on the perverse instruction sequences the compiler
generates.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)