From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C9BC4332F for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 19:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230135AbjKITt5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:49:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229613AbjKITt5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:49:57 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41ECB3C14; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30B0BC433C7; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 19:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:49:56 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Indu Bhagat , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/10] unwind: Introduce SFrame user space unwinding Message-ID: <20231109144956.0c20fd98@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20231109193759.6wugcdpucoilnncl@treble> References: <09460e60dd1c2f8ea1abb8d9188195db699ce76f.1699487758.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <24e46e1c-e9fa-4d44-97f2-068bda6e54b4@oracle.com> <20231109193759.6wugcdpucoilnncl@treble> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:37:59 -0800 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > The structure SFrame FDE in SFRAME_VERSION_1 was unaligned on-disk. We > > fixed that in SFRAME_VERSION_2 (Binutils 2.41) by adding some padding as you > > have already noted. For x86_64, its not an issue though, yes. > > Agreed. I actually had v2 implemented but then realized my binutils was > older so I changed to v1 for testing. But yeah, we can make v2 the > minimum. Cool, my test box has binutils 2.41, so it should be good to go ;-) -- Steve