From: Weinan Liu <wnliu@google.com>
To: ptsm@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: indu.bhagat@oracle.com, irogers@google.com,
joe.lawrence@redhat.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
rostedt@goodmis.org, will@kernel.org, wnliu@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] unwind: Implement generic sframe unwinder library
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 06:27:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250202062728.753686-1-wnliu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c034b597-e128-4356-bcc9-79fb5e39a844@linux.microsoft.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 2:22 AM Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> On 28-01-2025 03:03, Weinan Liu wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sframe_lookup.h b/include/linux/sframe_lookup.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..1c26cf1f38d4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/sframe_lookup.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_SFRAME_LOOKUP_H
> > +#define _LINUX_SFRAME_LOOKUP_H
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct sframe_ip_entry - sframe unwind info for given ip
> > + * @cfa_offset: Offset for the Canonical Frame Address(CFA) from Frame
> > + * Pointer(FP) or Stack Pointer(SP)
> > + * @ra_offset: Offset for the Return Address from CFA.
> > + * @fp_offset: Offset for the Frame Pointer (FP) from CFA.
> > + * @use_fp: Use FP to get next CFA or not
> > + */
> > +struct sframe_ip_entry {
> > + int32_t cfa_offset;
> > + int32_t ra_offset;
>
> The ra_offset is not present for x86_64 in SFrame FRE as per the spec. I
> am wondering whether this struct should change based on the architecture
> or just set ra_offset calculated from cfa_offset for x86_64.
According to the https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/sframe-spec.html#AMD64
For x86_64, RA will be stored at a fixed offset from the CFA upon function entry.
The ra_offset will set to sfhdr_p->cfa_fixed_ra_offset during the initialization
of the sframe_ip_entry within the function sframe_find_pc()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-02 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-27 21:33 [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel Weinan Liu
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] unwind: build kernel with sframe info Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 9:45 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-02-05 0:22 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-07 18:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: entry: add unwind info for various kernel entries Weinan Liu
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] unwind: add sframe v2 header Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 9:53 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-02-07 18:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] unwind: Implement generic sframe unwinder library Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 10:22 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-30 10:29 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-02-02 6:27 ` Weinan Liu [this message]
2025-02-02 6:37 ` Weinan Liu
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] unwind: arm64: Add sframe unwinder on arm64 Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 10:34 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] unwind: arm64: add reliable stacktrace support for arm64 Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 10:36 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: Define TIF_PATCH_PENDING for livepatch Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 9:54 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-02-27 12:10 ` Miroslav Benes
2025-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: Enable livepatch for ARM64 Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 9:55 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-01-31 16:08 ` Prasanna Kumar T S M
2025-02-03 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-01-28 15:35 ` [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel Indu Bhagat
2025-01-29 7:23 ` Weinan Liu
2025-01-30 17:59 ` Song Liu
2025-01-30 18:34 ` Song Liu
2025-01-30 19:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-01-30 19:18 ` Song Liu
2025-02-04 14:49 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-04 23:52 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-06 15:02 ` Weinan Liu
2025-02-07 12:16 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-07 17:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-10 8:30 ` Weinan Liu
2025-02-25 1:02 ` Weinan Liu
2025-02-25 18:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-25 23:01 ` Weinan Liu
2025-02-25 19:38 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-25 23:54 ` Weinan Liu
2025-02-26 0:22 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-26 10:23 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-26 17:40 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-27 9:38 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-28 6:47 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-03-09 14:43 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-12 23:32 ` Song Liu
2025-02-12 23:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-13 2:36 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 2:45 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-13 7:25 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 7:46 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-13 19:40 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 8:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-14 17:51 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 19:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-14 22:04 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 22:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-14 23:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-18 4:38 ` Song Liu
2025-02-18 6:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-18 18:20 ` Song Liu
2025-02-18 18:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-19 17:44 ` Song Liu
2025-02-20 4:50 ` Song Liu
2025-02-20 18:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
[not found] ` <CAPhsuW53DK2vFH-BZeUYN-eythX3NQEbcxrYf6jvBDtDmctRgw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-25 0:13 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 23:22 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-13 23:47 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 7:57 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-14 17:39 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-14 18:41 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-14 18:58 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-14 19:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-14 19:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-13 0:09 ` Indu Bhagat
2025-02-13 2:40 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 2:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-02-13 7:26 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-13 7:37 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 7:53 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-13 19:42 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 8:37 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-13 20:46 ` Song Liu
2025-02-13 22:21 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-13 23:34 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 1:58 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 8:56 ` Puranjay Mohan
2025-02-14 18:10 ` Song Liu
2025-02-14 18:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250202062728.753686-1-wnliu@google.com \
--to=wnliu@google.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).