From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
hpa@zytor.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: A few proposals, this time from the C++ standards committee
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:49:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgxB7LbAfAjx9_-N=4YDd+afMC8n1ydNh1v059bULNAGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb6af9b3-fe15-42e0-b080-3575920d45b4@paulmck-laptop>
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 17:42, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On the other hand, there is much more awareness of concurrency in that
> group than 20 years ago, so there is hope.
Yeah. But when I say "compiler writers don't understand memory
ordering", it's not that I think they need to be singled out - pretty
much *nobody* understands it.
Christ, I'm supposed to know it fairly well, and I still get it wrong
myself regularly and have to really think about it (and honestly just
prefer leaning on a few standard patterns rather than having to think
about it too much).
So "awareness of concurrency" is one thing, and I agree it's getting
much better.
Actually getting memory ordering right - even when you are aware of
concurrency - is another thing entirely.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-17 9:14 A few proposals, this time from the C++ standards committee Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-17 18:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-17 20:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-17 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-17 21:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-17 21:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-17 22:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-17 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-17 23:46 ` Jonathan Martin
2024-03-18 0:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-18 1:49 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2024-03-18 2:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-18 2:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-03-18 4:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-18 4:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-03-18 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-18 16:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-03-19 7:41 ` Marco Elver
2024-03-19 8:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-06-05 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-05 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-05 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-05 19:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-05 19:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgxB7LbAfAjx9_-N=4YDd+afMC8n1ydNh1v059bULNAGQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).