From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-toolchains-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F0FC43217
	for <linux-toolchains@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  5 Apr 2022 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S238158AbiDEMol (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-toolchains@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:44:41 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43206 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1356944AbiDELPz (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:15:55 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D416C546AC;
        Tue,  5 Apr 2022 03:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zn.tnic (p2e55dff8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.85.223.248])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 642EC1EC02B9;
        Tue,  5 Apr 2022 12:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1649155020;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
         in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
        bh=aAiETv6NNGhLTTzIDJkzKivJQy7gSmYaJopESRTcDRQ=;
        b=F6XF/rJjfwXREbr0pfnpBYgpNjGCPYK6nNqwoTSXR6Gfdo/AZreDbP6b5t6kW4MpUzL89c
        XCX8+pyP9quh9tkkJ0KxtKIpPJIolvLGZdQnpaGnI+4Ewz5fgr2HHJTH8/tVuS57trpB3v
        JXBPpkUNIbGrrM98joAlAPTpsj4hG8Y=
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 12:36:58 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc:     linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: older gccs and case labels producing integer constants
Message-ID: <YkwbygWj/C3XooMV@zn.tnic>
References: <YkwQ6+tIH8GQpuct@zn.tnic>
 <7o5nn52-nqn1-oo13-s6o9-59r85r91o768@fhfr.qr>
 <onrq8p1-582o-6rs9-r682-rs9sqoq7sq6p@fhfr.qr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <onrq8p1-582o-6rs9-r682-rs9sqoq7sq6p@fhfr.qr>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-toolchains.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 12:06:45PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Wird auch mit gcc 11 rejected.  Kanns sein dass mit gcc 7 andere
> compiler flags genommen werden?

Found it:

$ gcc -fsanitize=shift -c switch.c
switch.c: In function ‘foo’:
switch.c:10:7: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
       case (((0xfc08) << 16) | (0x0101)):;

$ gcc --version
gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.4.1 20190905 [gcc-7-branch revision 275407]
Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Something not fully backported?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette