From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, indu.bhagat@oracle.com,
puranjay@kernel.org, wnliu@google.com, irogers@google.com,
joe.lawrence@redhat.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
rostedt@goodmis.org, will@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 17:40:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCtfAcg32kbczs-g@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW4MAcVpXmZVQauoaYe0o3tDvvZfgmCrYFFyFojYpNiWWg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> ARM folks, please share your thoughts on this work. To fully support
> livepatching of kernel modules, we also need [1]. We hope we can
> land this in the 6.16 kernel.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250412010940.1686376-1-dylanbhatch@google.com/
I've had a quick look at [1], and IIUC that's a hard prerequisite for
livepatching, as without it the kernel *will* crash if it attempts a
late module relocation.
Given that, I don't think that we can take patch 2 until Will's comments
on [1] have been addressed, but I think that we could take patch 1 (with
fixups) as per my other reply.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-19 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 17:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe Song Liu
2025-03-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: Implement arch_stack_walk_reliable Song Liu
2025-03-20 17:46 ` Weinan Liu
2025-03-20 17:54 ` Song Liu
2025-03-21 7:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-03-26 13:48 ` Miroslav Benes
2025-03-31 9:06 ` Andrea della Porta
2025-05-19 13:41 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-19 16:57 ` Song Liu
2025-05-20 14:28 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-20 16:59 ` Mark Rutland
2025-03-20 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: Implement HAVE_LIVEPATCH Song Liu
2025-03-31 9:07 ` Andrea della Porta
2025-03-25 12:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe Petr Mladek
2025-03-25 13:37 ` Song Liu
2025-04-10 15:17 ` Petr Mladek
2025-05-16 16:53 ` Song Liu
2025-05-19 12:57 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-19 14:22 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-19 16:40 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-05-19 17:11 ` Dylan Hatch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCtfAcg32kbczs-g@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wnliu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).