From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: linux-trace-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:44046 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752847AbdLRPfH (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:35:07 -0500
Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id t8so29869525wmc.3
        for <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1513611304.2904.7.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] trace-cmd: restructure of the source tree
 [incomplete]
From: Vladislav Valtchev <vladislav.valtchev@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: y.karadz@gmail.com, linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:35:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20171213105318.5d8b3056@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20171212162534.31144-1-vladislav.valtchev@gmail.com>
         <20171212193004.05efce2e@gandalf.local.home>
         <1513173368.2565.64.camel@gmail.com>
         <20171213105318.5d8b3056@gandalf.local.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-trace-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-trace-devel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 10:53 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Do it in the next non-RFC patch set. I think you are starting to get
> the idea of what I want. And there's no reason to have it RFC. The next
> series may still not be ready to go in, but that's why we have v2, v3,
> v4... notations ;-)
> 

Sure, no problem. I'm working on it.