From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Slavomir Kaslev <kaslevs@vmware.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, slavomir.kaslev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 07/11] trace-cmd: Add `trace-cmd setup-guest` command
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:44:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218124437.0761e27b@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218143746.GD11734@box>
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:37:47 +0200
Slavomir Kaslev <kaslevs@vmware.com> wrote:
> This won't work as proposed: `p` will be NULL on the last iteration but will
> still get incremented from the outer for-loop and the check (p && *p) won't get
> triggered (p == 0x01 in this case).
I still don't like the "end", it just looks awkward.
>
> A fixed version might look like this:
>
> static int make_dir(const char *path, mode_t mode)
> {
> char buf[PATH_MAX+1], *p;
> int ret = 0;
>
> strncpy(buf, path, sizeof(buf));
> for (p = buf; *p; p++) {
> for (; *p == '/'; p++);
> p = strchr(p, '/');
>
> if (p)
> *p = '\0';
> ret = mkdir(buf, mode);
> if (ret < 0) {
> if (errno != EEXIST) {
> ret = -errno;
> break;
> }
> ret = 0;
> }
> if (!p)
> break;
> *p = '/';
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> OTOH I find the original version much more readable:
>
> static int make_dir(const char *path, mode_t mode)
> {
> char buf[PATH_MAX+1], *end, *p;
> int ret = 0;
>
> end = stpncpy(buf, path, sizeof(buf));
> for (p = buf; p < end; p++) {
> for (; p < end && *p == '/'; p++);
> for (; p < end && *p != '/'; p++);
>
> *p = '\0';
> ret = mkdir(buf, mode);
> if (ret < 0) {
> if (errno != EEXIST) {
> ret = -errno;
> break;
> }
> ret = 0;
> }
> *p = '/';
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> The intent behind `*p = '\0'; ... *p = '/';` is more clearly expressed in this
> version without getting bogged down by strchr() edge case handling.
>
> Since this is not on a performance critical path how about sticking to the more
> readable of the two?
>
I'd still like to use '*p' as that's very common.
Also break up the other for loops into a while loops.
for (p = buf; *p; p++) {
while (*p == '/')
p++;
while (*p && *p != '/')
p++;
if (*p)
*p = '\0';
else
p--; /* for the for loop */
[...]
This would work, and I think is still readable. It matches more the
standard way of the Linux kernel as well.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 14:13 [RFC PATCH v6 00/11] Add VM kernel tracing over vsockets and FIFOs Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/11] trace-cmd: Detect if vsockets are available Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/11] trace-cmd: Add tracecmd_create_recorder_virt function Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/11] trace-cmd: Add TRACE_REQ and TRACE_RESP messages Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 18:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 04/11] trace-cmd: Add buffer instance flags for tracing in guest and agent context Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-18 14:24 ` Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/11] trace-cmd: Add VM kernel tracing over vsockets transport Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 20:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-18 14:26 ` Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-18 14:28 ` Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/11] trace-cmd: Use splice(2) for vsockets if available Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/11] trace-cmd: Add `trace-cmd setup-guest` command Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 20:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-18 14:37 ` Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-18 17:44 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-02-18 20:07 ` Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-18 20:54 ` Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/11] trace-cmd: Try to autodetect number of guest CPUs in setup-guest if not specified Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/11] trace-cmd: Add setup-guest flag for attaching FIFOs to the guest VM config Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/11] trace-cmd: Add splice() recording from FIFO without additional pipe buffer Slavomir Kaslev
2019-02-14 21:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-14 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/11] trace-cmd: Add VM tracing over FIFOs transport Slavomir Kaslev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190218124437.0761e27b@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=kaslevs@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slavomir.kaslev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).