From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC08FC433E5 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EDE61A0A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229957AbhCXMPk (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:15:40 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60874 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232625AbhCXMPh (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:15:37 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 566A661A05; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:15:34 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Tzvetomir Stoyanov Cc: Linux Trace Devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/18] trace-cmd: Add a new flag to disable any timestamp corrections Message-ID: <20210324081534.14455de8@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210322095945.259300-1-tz.stoyanov@gmail.com> <20210322095945.259300-15-tz.stoyanov@gmail.com> <20210323214928.0c47e295@oasis.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:10:56 +0200 Tzvetomir Stoyanov wrote: > > And why did we change the code for IGNORE_DATE here too? > > When we discuss the priorities of the various time sync options, I > understood that the "--nodate" should affect the "--date" option only. > For all other time sync options, the new flag should be used. That's > why I changed IGNORE_DATE to RAW_TS in these two places. I kind of remember that, but as it's unrelated to this patch, let's make that a separate change, as it doesn't match the change log. Thanks! -- Steve