From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sameeruddin shaik <sameeross1994@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libtracefs: Add support for setting tracers
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 12:40:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210515124005.20f8dab3@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621177159-28156-1-git-send-email-sameeross1994@gmail.com>
Hi Sameer,
On Sun, 16 May 2021 20:29:19 +0530
Sameeruddin shaik <sameeross1994@gmail.com> wrote:
> tracefs_set_tracer - set the tracer
> tracefs_stop_tracer - clear the tracer
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameeruddin shaik <sameeross1994@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/tracefs.h b/include/tracefs.h
> index 55ee867..47d3282 100644
> --- a/include/tracefs.h
> +++ b/include/tracefs.h
> @@ -173,4 +173,26 @@ int tracefs_function_filter(struct tracefs_instance *instance, const char *filte
> int tracefs_function_notrace(struct tracefs_instance *instance, const char *filter,
> const char *module, unsigned int flags);
>
> +/*
> + * Tracers
> + */
> +enum tracefs_tracers {
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_NOP = 0,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_FUNCTION,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_FUNCTION_GRAPH,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_IRQSOFF,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_PREEMPTOFF,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_PREEMPTIRQSOFF,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_WAKEUP,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_WAKEUP_RT,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_WAKEUP_DL,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_MMIOTRACE,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_HWLAT,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_BRANCH,
> + TRACEFS_TRACER_BLOCK,
> +};
> +
> +int tracefs_set_tracer(struct tracefs_instance *instance, enum tracefs_tracers tracer);
> +
> +int tracefs_stop_tracer(struct tracefs_instance *instance);
> #endif /* _TRACE_FS_H */
> diff --git a/src/tracefs-tools.c b/src/tracefs-tools.c
> index 6ef17f6..ceddeda 100644
> --- a/src/tracefs-tools.c
> +++ b/src/tracefs-tools.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ __hidden pthread_mutex_t toplevel_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> #define TRACE_FILTER "set_ftrace_filter"
> #define TRACE_NOTRACE "set_ftrace_notrace"
> #define TRACE_FILTER_LIST "available_filter_functions"
> +#define TRACER "current_tracer"
>
> /* File descriptor for Top level set_ftrace_filter */
> static int ftrace_filter_fd = -1;
> @@ -910,3 +911,88 @@ int tracefs_function_notrace(struct tracefs_instance *instance, const char *filt
> tracefs_put_tracing_file(filter_path);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +int write_tracer(int fd, const char *tracer)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = write(fd, tracer, strlen(tracer));
> + if (ret < strlen(tracer))
> + return -1;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> +* tracefs_set_tracer - fucntion to set the tracer
> +* @instance: ftrace instance, can be NULL for top tracing instance
> +* @tracer: Tracer that has to be set, which can be integer from 0 - 13
> +* or and enum value
> +*/
> +
> +int tracefs_set_tracer(struct tracefs_instance *instance, enum tracefs_tracers tracer)
> +{
> + char *tracer_path;
> + int ret = -1;
> + int fd = -1;
> +
> + tracer_path = tracefs_instance_get_file(instance, TRACER);
> + if (!tracer_path)
> + return -1;
> +
> + fd = open(tracer_path, O_WRONLY);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + switch(tracer) {
> + case 0:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd , "nop");
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "function");
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "function_graph");
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "irqsoff");
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "preemptoff");
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "preemptirqsoff");
> + break;
> + case 6:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "wakeup");
> + break;
> + case 7:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "wakeup_rt");
> + break;
> + case 8:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "wakeup_dl");
> + break;
> + case 9:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "mmiotrace");
> + break;
> + case 10:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "hwlat");
> + break;
> + case 11:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "branch");
> + break;
> + case 12:
> + ret = write_tracer(fd, "blk");
> + break;
> + default:
Note, hardcoded numbers above is frowned upon in computer science in
general. But you already have the enums, why didn't you use them?
But besides the point, you don't even need a switch statement.
#define TRACERS \
C(NOP, "nop"), \
C(FUNCTION, "function"), \
C(FUNCTION_GRAPH, "function_graph"), \
C(IRQSOFF, "irqsoff"), \
C(PREEMPTOFF, "preemptoff"), \
C(PREEMPTIQRSOFF, "preemptirqsoff"), \
C(WAKEUP, "wakeup"), \
C(WAKEUP_RT, "wakeup_rt")' \
C(WAKEUP_DL, "wakeup_dl"), \
C(MMIOTRACE, "mmiotrace"), \
C(HWLAT, "hwlat"), \
C(BRANCH, "branch"), \
C(BLOCK, "block")
#undef C
#define C(a,b) b
const char *tracers[] = { TRACERS };
#undef C
#define C(a,b) TRACEFS_TRACER_##a
const int *tracer_enums[] = { TRACERS };
#define ARRAY_SIZE(a) (sizeof(a) / sizeof(a[0]))
{
const char *t = NULL;
[..]
if (tracer < 0 || tracer >= ARRAY_SIZE(tracers)) {
errno = -ENODEV;
return -1;
}
/* if we didn't make a mistake in our mapping */
if (tracer == tracer_enums[tracer]) {
t = tracers[tracer];
} else {
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tracer_enums)) {
if (tracer == tracer_enums[tracer]) {
t = tracers[i];
break;
}
}
}
if (!t) {
/* Something went horribly wrong */
errno = -EINVAL;
return -1;
}
ret = write_tracer(fd, t);
Or something like the above. Much more robust, much more maintainable.
-- Steve
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> +
> + out:
> + tracefs_put_tracing_file(tracer_path);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int tracefs_stop_tracer(struct tracefs_instance *instance)
> +{
> + return tracefs_set_tracer(instance, TRACEFS_TRACER_NOP);
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-15 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-16 14:59 [PATCH] libtracefs: Add support for setting tracers Sameeruddin shaik
2021-05-15 16:40 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-17 9:24 Sameeruddin shaik
2021-05-17 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-18 15:18 ` sameeruddin shaik
2021-05-17 15:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-18 15:26 Sameeruddin shaik
2021-05-17 15:32 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210515124005.20f8dab3@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameeross1994@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).