From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] user_events: Add minimal support for trace_event into ftrace
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 22:40:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211112224032.f3b3f43002c28d3c8613b4fa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211111173334.GA1433@kbox>
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:33:34 -0800
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:56:30PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:08:44 -0800
> > Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to keep verifying in writer side then we can ensure the
> > data on ring buffer (of perf and of ftrace) is sane. If you add the unsafe
> > flag, you have to change all the code which access the ring buffer, not only
> > the filter but also eprobes, histograms, perf-tools, and other user-space
> > tracing tools which reads the tracing buffer directly.
> >
> > > It sounded like Steven wanted to think about this a bit, so I'll wait a
> > > bit before poking again for consensus :)
> > >
> > > Do you have any strong feelings about where it goes?
> >
> > I recommend you to start verifying the writer side, it should make the
> > change as small as possible. Unsafe flag idea may involve many other
> > tools. And it is not fundamentary required for user-events.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Ok, I will start there.
>
> Are static string buffers required as well for the null check?
>
> Or is this only for dyn strings that require the check?
Good question! The dynamic strings is ensured to be null-terminated,
but the static string is not because the size is fixed (at least
event filter checked that.)
BTW, I found that the hist_triger_elt_update() doesn't check the
field size for fixed-size string (only use STR_VAR_LEN_MAX to limit.)
It seems buggy if the fixed-size char [] field is not null terminated.
(e.g. it is used for storing array-data)
Let me fix that.
> Also, I am assuming that __rel_loc offset is based after the __rel_loc
> payload, IE: Offset 0 of __rel_loc is immediately after the 4 byte
> __rel_loc description?
Yes, so if the field is the last one, the offset can be 0.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-12 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 17:04 [PATCH v4 00/10] user_events: Enable user processes to create and write to trace events Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] user_events: Add UABI header for user access to user_events Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] user_events: Add minimal support for trace_event into ftrace Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 21:34 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-08 2:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-08 16:59 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-07 14:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-08 17:13 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 18:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 20:25 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 22:09 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 22:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 22:59 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-09 4:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-09 2:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-09 19:08 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-09 19:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-09 20:14 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-09 20:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-09 21:27 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-09 21:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-10 13:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-11 17:33 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-12 13:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2021-11-07 18:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 19:56 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 21:15 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] user_events: Add print_fmt generation support for basic types Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 22:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] user_events: Handle matching arguments from dyn_events Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 22:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] user_events: Add basic perf and eBPF support Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] user_events: Add self-test for ftrace integration Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] user_events: Add self-test for dynamic_events integration Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] user_events: Add self-test for perf_event integration Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] user_events: Optimize writing events by only copying data once Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 22:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 23:00 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 23:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-08 23:17 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-08 23:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] user_events: Add documentation file Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 19:05 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-11-04 21:08 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-04 21:18 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211112224032.f3b3f43002c28d3c8613b4fa@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).