From: Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
beaub@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/12] user_events: Add documentation file
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:50:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211116005047.1808-11-beaub@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211116005047.1808-1-beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
Add a documentation file about user_events with example code, etc.
explaining how it may be used.
Signed-off-by: Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
---
Documentation/trace/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/trace/user_events.rst | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/user_events.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
index 3769b9b7aed8..3a47aa8341c6 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
@@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ Linux Tracing Technologies
stm
sys-t
coresight/index
+ user_events
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/user_events.rst b/Documentation/trace/user_events.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e77e71b2fe9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/trace/user_events.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+=========================================
+user_events: User-based Event Tracing
+=========================================
+
+:Author: Beau Belgrave
+
+Overview
+--------
+User based trace events allow user processes to create events and trace data
+that can be viewed via existing tools, such as ftrace, perf and eBPF.
+To enable this feature, build your kernel with CONFIG_USER_EVENTS=y.
+
+Programs can view status of the events via
+/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/user_events_status and can both register and write
+data out via /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/user_events_data.
+
+Programs can also use /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/dynamic_events to register and
+delete user based events via the u: prefix. The format of the command to
+dynamic_events is the same as the ioctl with the u: prefix applied.
+
+Typically programs will register a set of events that they wish to expose to
+tools that can read trace_events (such as ftrace and perf). The registration
+process gives back two ints to the program for each event. The first int is the
+status index. This index describes which byte in the
+/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/user_events_status file represents this event. The
+second int is the write index. This index describes the data when a write() or
+writev() is called on the /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/user_events_data file.
+
+The structures referenced in this document are contained with the
+/include/uap/linux/user_events.h file in the source tree.
+
+**NOTE:** *Both user_events_status and user_events_data are under the tracefs
+filesystem and may be mounted at different paths than above.*
+
+Registering
+-----------
+Registering within a user process is done via ioctl() out to the
+/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/user_events_data file. The command to issue is
+DIAG_IOCSREG. This command takes a struct user_reg as an argument.
+
+The struct user_reg requires two values, the first is the size of the structure
+to ensure forward and backward compatibility. The second is the command string
+to issue for registering.
+
+User based events show up under tracefs like any other event under the
+subsystem named "user_events". This means tools that wish to attach to the
+events need to use /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/user_events/[name]/enable
+or perf record -e user_events:[name] when attaching/recording.
+
+**NOTE:** *The write_index returned is only valid for the FD that was used*
+
+Command Format
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+The command string format is as follows::
+
+ name[:FLAG1[,FLAG2...]] [Field1[;Field2...]]
+
+Supported Flags
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+**BPF_ITER** - EBPF programs attached to this event will get the raw iovec
+struct instead of any data copies for max performance.
+
+Field Format
+^^^^^^^^^^^^
+::
+
+ type name [size]
+
+Basic types are supported (__data_loc, u32, u64, int, char, char[20], etc).
+User programs are encouraged to use clearly sized types like u32.
+
+**NOTE:** *Long is not supported since size can vary between user and kernel.*
+
+The size is only valid for types that start with a struct prefix.
+This allows user programs to describe custom structs out to tools, if required.
+
+For example, a struct in C that looks like this::
+
+ struct mytype {
+ char data[20];
+ };
+
+Would be represented by the following field::
+
+ struct mytype myname 20
+
+Status
+------
+When tools attach/record user based events the status of the event is updated
+in realtime. This allows user programs to only incur the cost of the write() or
+writev() calls when something is actively attached to the event.
+
+User programs call mmap() on /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/user_events_status to
+check the status for each event that is registered. The byte to check in the
+file is given back after the register ioctl() via user_reg.status_index.
+Currently the size of user_events_status is a single page, however, custom
+kernel configurations can change this size to allow more user based events. In
+all cases the size of the file is a multiple of a page size.
+
+For example, if the register ioctl() gives back a status_index of 3 you would
+check byte 3 of the returned mmap data to see if anything is attached to that
+event.
+
+Administrators can easily check the status of all registered events by reading
+the user_events_status file directly via a terminal. The output is as follows::
+
+ Byte:Name [# Comments]
+ ...
+
+ Active: ActiveCount
+ Buisy: BusyCount
+ Max: MaxCount
+
+For example, on a system that has a single event the output looks like this::
+
+ 1:test
+
+ Active: 1
+ Busy: 0
+ Max: 4096
+
+If a user enables the user event via ftrace, the output would change to this::
+
+ 1:test # Used by ftrace
+
+ Active: 1
+ Busy: 1
+ Max: 4096
+
+**NOTE:** *A status index of 0 will never be returned. This allows user
+programs to have an index that can be used on error cases.*
+
+Status Bits
+^^^^^^^^^^^
+The byte being checked will be non-zero if anything is attached. Programs can
+check specific bits in the byte to see what mechanism has been attached.
+
+The following values are defined to aid in checking what has been attached:
+
+**EVENT_STATUS_FTRACE** - Bit set if ftrace has been attached (Bit 0).
+
+**EVENT_STATUS_PERF** - Bit set if perf/eBPF has been attached (Bit 1).
+
+Writing Data
+------------
+After registering an event the same fd that was used to register can be used
+to write an entry for that event. The write_index returned must be at the start
+of the data, then the remaining data is treated as the payload of the event.
+
+For example, if write_index returned was 1 and I wanted to write out an int
+payload of the event. Then the data would have to be 8 bytes (2 ints) in size,
+with the first 4 bytes being equal to 1 and the last 4 bytes being equal to the
+value I want as the payload.
+
+In memory this would look like this::
+
+ int index;
+ int payload;
+
+User programs might have well known structs that they wish to use to emit out
+as payloads. In those cases writev() can be used, with the first vector being
+the index and the following vector(s) being the actual event payload.
+
+For example, if I have a struct like this::
+
+ struct payload {
+ int src;
+ int dst;
+ int flags;
+ };
+
+It's advised for user programs to do the following::
+
+ struct iovec io[2];
+ struct payload e;
+
+ io[0].iov_base = &write_index;
+ io[0].iov_len = sizeof(write_index);
+ io[1].iov_base = &e;
+ io[1].iov_len = sizeof(e);
+
+ writev(fd, (const struct iovec*)io, 2);
+
+**NOTE:** *The write_index is not emitted out into the trace being recorded.*
+
+EBPF
+----
+EBPF programs that attach to a user-based event tracepoint are given a pointer
+to a struct user_bpf_context. The bpf context contains the data type (which can
+be a user or kernel buffer, or can be a pointer to the iovec) and the data
+length that was emitted (minus the write_index).
+
+Example Code
+------------
+See sample code in samples/user_events.
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 0:50 [PATCH v5 00/12] user_events: Enable user processes to create and write to trace events Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] user_events: Add UABI header for user access to user_events Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] user_events: Add minimal support for trace_event into ftrace Beau Belgrave
2021-11-18 2:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-18 20:01 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] user_events: Add print_fmt generation support for basic types Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] user_events: Handle matching arguments from dyn_events Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] user_events: Add basic perf and eBPF support Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] user_events: Add self-test for ftrace integration Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] user_events: Add self-test for dynamic_events integration Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] user_events: Add self-test for perf_event integration Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] user_events: Optimize writing events by only copying data once Beau Belgrave
2021-11-27 15:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-16 0:50 ` Beau Belgrave [this message]
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] user_events: Add sample code for typical usage Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 0:50 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] user_events: Validate user payloads for size and null termination Beau Belgrave
2021-11-16 21:11 ` Beau Belgrave
2021-11-18 1:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-18 19:45 ` Beau Belgrave
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211116005047.1808-11-beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).