linux-trace-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, williskung@google.com,
	kaleshsingh@google.com, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add wake up latency timings
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:13:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220325161333.65ffb789@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yj4ZPMJdz49eQy7I@donbot>

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:34:20 +0000
John Keeping <john@metanate.com> wrote:

> > +static void process_wakeup(struct analysis_data *data,
> > +			   struct tep_handle *tep,
> > +			   struct tep_record *record)
> > +{
> > +	struct cpu_data *cpu_data = &data->cpu_data[record->cpu];
> > +	struct task_cpu_item *cpu_task;
> > +	struct task_item *task;
> > +	unsigned long long val;
> > +	int pid;
> > +
> > +	tep_read_number_field(data->wakeup_pid, record->data, &val);
> > +	pid = val;
> > +	cpu_task = get_cpu_task(cpu_data, pid);  
> 
> Should this use get_task() instead of get_cpu_task()?
> 
> I was trying this out and it provides a great overview of a trace but I
> found it strange that tasks affine to CPU N were also appearing in the
> list for CPU M.

Yes, you are correct, because I noticed the same issue :-D

I'll fix it in v2.

Thanks,

-- Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24  2:57 [PATCH 00/12] trace-cmd: Add trace-cmd analyze command Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 01/12] trace-cmd: Add trace-cmd analyze Steven Rostedt
2022-03-28 16:08   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-03-28 16:34     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 02/12] trace-cmd analyze: Show what tasks are running the most Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 03/12] trace-cmd analyze: Show how much tasks run on each CPU Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 19:36   ` John Keeping
2022-03-25 20:18     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-26 11:07       ` John Keeping
2022-03-26 15:16         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-28 16:23           ` Kalesh Singh
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 04/12] trace-cmd analyze: Use sched_switch to find comm mappings Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 05/12] trace-cmd analyze: Use sched_switch event to update times Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 06/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add tracing of tasks and their states Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 19:37   ` John Keeping
2022-03-25 20:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 07/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add "idleness" Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 08/12] trace-cmd analyze: Track migration Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 09/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add wake up latency timings Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 19:34   ` John Keeping
2022-03-25 20:13     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2022-03-25 20:31       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-26 11:14         ` John Keeping
2022-03-26 15:32           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 10/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add counting of page faults Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 11/12] trace-cmd analyze: Account for dropped events Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24  2:57 ` [PATCH 12/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add documentation Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220325161333.65ffb789@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=john@metanate.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=williskung@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).