[PATCH 19/24] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported
by codespell.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
--- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
+++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was
 then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis.
 
 Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer
-threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava
+threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have
 priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time
 kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays.