From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Stevie Alvarez <stevie.6strings@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] libtraceeval: Add traceeval_iterator_remove()
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 05:09:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927050922.37710056@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824201906.GD110858@google.com>
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:19:06 -0600
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> wrote:
> > +int traceeval_iterator_remove(struct traceeval_iterator *iter)
> > +{
> > + struct traceeval *teval = iter->teval;
> > + struct hash_table *hist = teval->hist;
> > + struct entry *entry;
> > +
> > + if (iter->next < 1 || iter->next > iter->nr_entries)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + entry = iter->entries[iter->next - 1];
> > + if (!entry)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + hash_remove(hist, &entry->hash);
>
> Are we leaking 'entry' after we've removed it from the hash?
Yeah, I guess we are. Good catch!
>
> I think we need to call free_entry() in both traceeval_iterator_remove() as
> well as traceeval_remove(), just like we do in the loop in
> hist_table_release().
Yep, thanks Ross!
-- Steve
>
> > +
> > + /* The entry no longer exists */
> > + iter->entries[iter->next - 1] = NULL;
> > + teval->update_counter++;
> > +
> > + return 1;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-17 22:24 [PATCH 0/9] libtraceeval: Even more updates! Steven Rostedt
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/9] libtraceeval: Add check for updates to know to recreate iter array Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 19:41 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/9] libtraceeval: Add traceeval_iterator_query() Steven Rostedt
2023-08-17 22:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-20 18:18 ` Stevie Alvarez
2023-08-21 14:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 19:57 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 3/9] libtraceeval: Add traceeval_iterator_stat() Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 20:07 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 4/9] libtraceeval: Add traceeval_iterator_remove() Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 20:19 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-24 20:23 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-09-27 9:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-27 9:09 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 5/9] libtraceeval histogram: Add type to traceeval_data and make it a structure Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 21:09 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 6/9] libtraceveal: Add type checks to traceeval_data vals and keys Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 21:23 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] libtraceeval: Add size checks to insert and query functions Steven Rostedt
2023-08-17 22:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 8/9] libtraceeval: Add checks to traceeval_insert() and query() Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 21:36 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-08-17 22:24 ` [PATCH 9/9] libtraceeval: Only do stats on values marked with the STAT flag Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24 22:02 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230927050922.37710056@rorschach.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stevie.6strings@gmail.com \
--cc=zwisler@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).