[PATCH v2 0/2] libtraceeval: Remove the need of TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE

[PATCH v2 0/2] libtraceeval: Remove the need of TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE

[Steven Rostedt]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

The use of macros to determine the size of the keys and vals arrays made
me think a bit more about how we initialize the traceeval. The more I'm
using the library, the less I like having to add the TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE
to the end of the keys and vals array.

Instead, use the same macro trick of TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE() to determine
the number of elements. Still allow the use of using the
TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE to determine the size (if the number passed in is
still bigger), so that most applications that still use that still work.

I made the change separate than updating the sample code to test that
the old way still works. Then I updated the sample to make sure the new
way works. Perhaps when we add unit tests back in, we'll test both
cases.

Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20230929100025.1018258-1-rostedt@goodmis.org/

 - Added size checks to check_keys() and check_vals() (Ross Zwisler)

Steven Rostedt (Google) (2):
  libtraceeval: Remove need to use TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE in keys and vals
  libtraceeval samples: Remove adding TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE to keys and
    vals

 include/traceeval-hist.h | 11 +++++++++--
 samples/task-eval.c      | 18 ------------------
 src/histograms.c         | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.40.1

[PATCH v2 1/2] libtraceeval: Remove need to use TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE in keys and vals

[Steven Rostedt]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Currently, the size of the keys and vals are determined by the
requirement that the traceeval_type array end with an empty element of
type TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE.

To make the API be able to handle changes of the size of that structure,
the traceeval_init() was converted to a macro to pass in the sizeof of
that structure. This also means it can calculate the size of the array
with the TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE() macro.

Remove the need to have the initialization of traceeval keys and vals
have to add the NONE element at the end. It can still do so and this
will work just the same (the size will be determined by either the size
passed in or the first NONE element, which ever is smaller).

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/traceeval-hist.h | 11 +++++++++--
 src/histograms.c         | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/traceeval-hist.h b/include/traceeval-hist.h
index 65a905034773..cd089b28b852 100644
--- a/include/traceeval-hist.h
+++ b/include/traceeval-hist.h
@@ -171,12 +171,19 @@ struct traceeval;
 
 /* Histogram interfaces */
 
-#define traceeval_init(keys, vals) \
-	traceeval_init_data_size(keys, vals, sizeof(struct traceeval_type), \
+#define traceeval_init(keys, vals)					\
+	traceeval_init_size(keys, vals,					\
+			    TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE(keys),			\
+			    (void *)vals == NULL ?  0 : TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE(vals))
+
+#define traceeval_init_size(keys, vals, nr_keys, nr_vals)		\
+	traceeval_init_data_size(keys, vals, nr_keys, nr_vals,		\
+				 sizeof(struct traceeval_type),		\
 				 sizeof(struct traceeval_data))
 
 struct traceeval *traceeval_init_data_size(struct traceeval_type *keys,
 					   struct traceeval_type *vals,
+					   size_t nr_keys, size_t nr_vals,
 					   size_t sizeof_type, size_t sizeof_data);
 
 void traceeval_release(struct traceeval *teval);
diff --git a/src/histograms.c b/src/histograms.c
index d8ee373be705..0f20d76b5e04 100644
--- a/src/histograms.c
+++ b/src/histograms.c
@@ -151,7 +151,8 @@ static void type_release(struct traceeval_type *defs, size_t len)
  * Returns the size of the array pointed to by @copy, or -1 on error.
  */
 static size_t type_alloc(const struct traceeval_type *defs,
-			 struct traceeval_type **copy)
+			 struct traceeval_type **copy,
+			 size_t cnt)
 {
 	struct traceeval_type *new_defs = NULL;
 	size_t size;
@@ -162,7 +163,8 @@ static size_t type_alloc(const struct traceeval_type *defs,
 	if (!defs)
 		return 0;
 
-	for (size = 0; defs && defs[size].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; size++)
+	for (size = 0; defs && size < cnt &&
+		     defs[size].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; size++)
 		;
 
 	if (!size)
@@ -198,9 +200,9 @@ fail:
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static int check_keys(struct traceeval_type *keys)
+static int check_keys(struct traceeval_type *keys, int cnt)
 {
-	for (int i = 0; keys[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
+	for (int i = 0; i < cnt && keys[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
 		/* Define this as a key */
 		keys[i].flags |= TRACEEVAL_FL_KEY;
 		keys[i].flags &= ~TRACEEVAL_FL_VALUE;
@@ -220,9 +222,9 @@ static int check_keys(struct traceeval_type *keys)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int check_vals(struct traceeval_type *vals)
+static int check_vals(struct traceeval_type *vals, int cnt)
 {
-	for (int i = 0; vals[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
+	for (int i = 0; i < cnt && vals[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
 		/* Define this as a value */
 		vals[i].flags |= TRACEEVAL_FL_VALUE;
 		vals[i].flags &= ~TRACEEVAL_FL_KEY;
@@ -269,6 +271,7 @@ static int check_vals(struct traceeval_type *vals)
  */
 struct traceeval *traceeval_init_data_size(struct traceeval_type *keys,
 					   struct traceeval_type *vals,
+					   size_t nr_keys, size_t nr_vals,
 					   size_t sizeof_type, size_t sizeof_data)
 {
 	struct traceeval *teval;
@@ -290,25 +293,25 @@ struct traceeval *traceeval_init_data_size(struct traceeval_type *keys,
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
-	ret = check_keys(keys);
+	ret = check_keys(keys, nr_keys);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto fail_release;
 
 	if (vals) {
-		ret = check_vals(vals);
+		ret = check_vals(vals, nr_vals);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto fail_release;
 	}
 
 	/* alloc key types */
-	teval->nr_key_types = type_alloc(keys, &teval->key_types);
+	teval->nr_key_types = type_alloc(keys, &teval->key_types, nr_keys);
 	if (teval->nr_key_types <= 0) {
 		err_msg = "Failed to allocate user defined keys";
 		goto fail_release;
 	}
 
 	/* alloc val types */
-	teval->nr_val_types = type_alloc(vals, &teval->val_types);
+	teval->nr_val_types = type_alloc(vals, &teval->val_types, nr_vals);
 	if (teval->nr_val_types < 0) {
 		err_msg = "Failed to allocate user defined values";
 		goto fail_release;
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libtraceeval: Remove need to use TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE in keys and vals

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:08:01AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Currently, the size of the keys and vals are determined by the
> requirement that the traceeval_type array end with an empty element of
> type TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE.
> 
> To make the API be able to handle changes of the size of that structure,
> the traceeval_init() was converted to a macro to pass in the sizeof of
> that structure. This also means it can calculate the size of the array
> with the TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE() macro.
> 
> Remove the need to have the initialization of traceeval keys and vals
> have to add the NONE element at the end. It can still do so and this
> will work just the same (the size will be determined by either the size
> passed in or the first NONE element, which ever is smaller).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

IMO trying to support both types of inputs (ending with TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE
and just relying on the element count) is probably bad long term because one
or the other will break and we may not notice, and we'll have to make sure we
keep up both.

As we don't really have users yet (do we?) can we just move fully over to the
count way and give on the other?

In either case, we probably need to still update the comments above
type_alloc(), traceeval_init_data_size() and traceeval_insert_size() which
talk about how we rely on TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE to terminate our element lists.

What we have here though is correct:
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>

> ---
>  include/traceeval-hist.h | 11 +++++++++--
>  src/histograms.c         | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/traceeval-hist.h b/include/traceeval-hist.h
> index 65a905034773..cd089b28b852 100644
> --- a/include/traceeval-hist.h
> +++ b/include/traceeval-hist.h
> @@ -171,12 +171,19 @@ struct traceeval;
>  
>  /* Histogram interfaces */
>  
> -#define traceeval_init(keys, vals) \
> -	traceeval_init_data_size(keys, vals, sizeof(struct traceeval_type), \
> +#define traceeval_init(keys, vals)					\
> +	traceeval_init_size(keys, vals,					\
> +			    TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE(keys),			\
> +			    (void *)vals == NULL ?  0 : TRACEEVAL_ARRAY_SIZE(vals))
> +
> +#define traceeval_init_size(keys, vals, nr_keys, nr_vals)		\
> +	traceeval_init_data_size(keys, vals, nr_keys, nr_vals,		\
> +				 sizeof(struct traceeval_type),		\
>  				 sizeof(struct traceeval_data))
>  
>  struct traceeval *traceeval_init_data_size(struct traceeval_type *keys,
>  					   struct traceeval_type *vals,
> +					   size_t nr_keys, size_t nr_vals,
>  					   size_t sizeof_type, size_t sizeof_data);
>  
>  void traceeval_release(struct traceeval *teval);
> diff --git a/src/histograms.c b/src/histograms.c
> index d8ee373be705..0f20d76b5e04 100644
> --- a/src/histograms.c
> +++ b/src/histograms.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,8 @@ static void type_release(struct traceeval_type *defs, size_t len)
>   * Returns the size of the array pointed to by @copy, or -1 on error.
>   */
>  static size_t type_alloc(const struct traceeval_type *defs,
> -			 struct traceeval_type **copy)
> +			 struct traceeval_type **copy,
> +			 size_t cnt)
>  {
>  	struct traceeval_type *new_defs = NULL;
>  	size_t size;
> @@ -162,7 +163,8 @@ static size_t type_alloc(const struct traceeval_type *defs,
>  	if (!defs)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	for (size = 0; defs && defs[size].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; size++)
> +	for (size = 0; defs && size < cnt &&
> +		     defs[size].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; size++)
>  		;
>  
>  	if (!size)
> @@ -198,9 +200,9 @@ fail:
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> -static int check_keys(struct traceeval_type *keys)
> +static int check_keys(struct traceeval_type *keys, int cnt)
>  {
> -	for (int i = 0; keys[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
> +	for (int i = 0; i < cnt && keys[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
>  		/* Define this as a key */
>  		keys[i].flags |= TRACEEVAL_FL_KEY;
>  		keys[i].flags &= ~TRACEEVAL_FL_VALUE;
> @@ -220,9 +222,9 @@ static int check_keys(struct traceeval_type *keys)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int check_vals(struct traceeval_type *vals)
> +static int check_vals(struct traceeval_type *vals, int cnt)
>  {
> -	for (int i = 0; vals[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
> +	for (int i = 0; i < cnt && vals[i].type != TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE; i++) {
>  		/* Define this as a value */
>  		vals[i].flags |= TRACEEVAL_FL_VALUE;
>  		vals[i].flags &= ~TRACEEVAL_FL_KEY;
> @@ -269,6 +271,7 @@ static int check_vals(struct traceeval_type *vals)
>   */
>  struct traceeval *traceeval_init_data_size(struct traceeval_type *keys,
>  					   struct traceeval_type *vals,
> +					   size_t nr_keys, size_t nr_vals,
>  					   size_t sizeof_type, size_t sizeof_data)
>  {
>  	struct traceeval *teval;
> @@ -290,25 +293,25 @@ struct traceeval *traceeval_init_data_size(struct traceeval_type *keys,
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = check_keys(keys);
> +	ret = check_keys(keys, nr_keys);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto fail_release;
>  
>  	if (vals) {
> -		ret = check_vals(vals);
> +		ret = check_vals(vals, nr_vals);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto fail_release;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* alloc key types */
> -	teval->nr_key_types = type_alloc(keys, &teval->key_types);
> +	teval->nr_key_types = type_alloc(keys, &teval->key_types, nr_keys);
>  	if (teval->nr_key_types <= 0) {
>  		err_msg = "Failed to allocate user defined keys";
>  		goto fail_release;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* alloc val types */
> -	teval->nr_val_types = type_alloc(vals, &teval->val_types);
> +	teval->nr_val_types = type_alloc(vals, &teval->val_types, nr_vals);
>  	if (teval->nr_val_types < 0) {
>  		err_msg = "Failed to allocate user defined values";
>  		goto fail_release;
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libtraceeval: Remove need to use TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE in keys and vals

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:39:20 -0600
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> wrote:

> IMO trying to support both types of inputs (ending with TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE
> and just relying on the element count) is probably bad long term because one
> or the other will break and we may not notice, and we'll have to make sure we
> keep up both.

I plan on really only supporting the one type (defined size), the
TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE will not be shown in the man pages. The reason I want
to keep them is mostly for debugging (can add this to test issues and what not).

So yeah, I agree we only want to support one, and we are going to do that,
but the other will still be there "hidden" from the users ;-)

> 
> As we don't really have users yet (do we?) can we just move fully over to the
> count way and give on the other?
> 
> In either case, we probably need to still update the comments above
> type_alloc(), traceeval_init_data_size() and traceeval_insert_size() which
> talk about how we rely on TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE to terminate our element lists.

Will do that in another patch. But right now I'm working on the man pages,
and that's really where I expect people to get their information on how to
use the library.

> 
> What we have here though is correct:
> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>

Thanks,

-- Steve

[PATCH v2 2/2] libtraceeval samples: Remove adding TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE to keys and vals

[Steven Rostedt]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Remove the TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE in the initialization of keys and vals in
the sample code as it is no longer needed.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 samples/task-eval.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/task-eval.c b/samples/task-eval.c
index 6b01b8d076f2..361c4a835f06 100644
--- a/samples/task-eval.c
+++ b/samples/task-eval.c
@@ -89,9 +89,6 @@ static struct traceeval_type cpu_keys[] = {
 		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NUMBER,
 		.name = "Schedule state",
 	},
-	{
-		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE
-	}
 };
 
 static struct traceeval_type process_keys[] = {
@@ -103,9 +100,6 @@ static struct traceeval_type process_keys[] = {
 		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NUMBER,
 		.name = "Schedule state"
 	},
-	{
-		.type	= TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE,
-	}
 };
 
 static struct traceeval_type process_data_vals[] = {
@@ -113,9 +107,6 @@ static struct traceeval_type process_data_vals[] = {
 		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_POINTER,
 		.name = "data",
 	},
-	{
-		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE
-	}
 };
 
 static struct traceeval_type thread_keys[] = {
@@ -127,9 +118,6 @@ static struct traceeval_type thread_keys[] = {
 		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NUMBER,
 		.name = "Schedule state",
 	},
-	{
-		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE,
-	}
 };
 
 static struct traceeval_type timestamp_vals[] = {
@@ -138,9 +126,6 @@ static struct traceeval_type timestamp_vals[] = {
 		.name = "Timestamp",
 		.flags = TRACEEVAL_FL_TIMESTAMP,
 	},
-	{
-		.type = TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE
-	}
 };
 
 static struct traceeval_type delta_vals[] = {
@@ -149,9 +134,6 @@ static struct traceeval_type delta_vals[] = {
 		.name	= "delta",
 		.flags = TRACEEVAL_FL_STAT,
 	},
-	{
-		.type	= TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE,
-	},
 };
 
 enum sched_state {
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] libtraceeval samples: Remove adding TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE to keys and vals

[Ross Zwisler]

On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Remove the TRACEEVAL_TYPE_NONE in the initialization of keys and vals in
> the sample code as it is no longer needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>