linux-trace-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-devel <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Set user_events to BROKEN
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:28:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgZ0RccFsUhgKpdh130ydsY57bqaCGRQS7w3-ckgHP=OA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546405229.199729.1648659253425.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> If we are not ready to commit to an ABI, perhaps it would be safer to ensure
> that include/uapi/linux/user_events.h is not installed with the uapi headers
> until it's ready.

I don't th8ink the uapi matters if the code then cannot be used.
There's no regression in that.

That said, if we leave the code in the kernel source tree, I feel like
we should probably at least compile-test it.

So maybe it should be marked as

        depends on BROKEN || COMPILE_TEST

instead?

             Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30  2:25 [PATCH] tracing: Set user_events to BROKEN Steven Rostedt
2022-03-30 16:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-03-30 17:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-30 19:28   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2022-03-30 19:31     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-30 19:57       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgZ0RccFsUhgKpdh130ydsY57bqaCGRQS7w3-ckgHP=OA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).