From: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, williskung@google.com,
kaleshsingh@google.com, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] trace-cmd analyze: Show how much tasks run on each CPU
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:07:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yj7z1zaDDlyHdg39@donbot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220325161819.36de3bce@gandalf.local.home>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 04:18:19PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:36:24 +0000
> John Keeping <john@metanate.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:57:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > >
> > > Display for each CPU that was traced, the amount of time tasks ran on
> > > them. Listing the tasks from the longest runner to the least.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > ---
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nr_tasks; i++) {
> > > + task = cpu_tasks[i]->task;
> > > +
> > > + if (!i) {
> > > + printf(" Task name PID \t Run time\n");
> > > + printf(" --------- --- \t --------\n");
> > > + }
> > > + printf("%16s %8d\t",
> > > + tep_data_comm_from_pid(tep, task->pid),
> > > + task->pid);
> > > + print_time(cpu_tasks[i]->runtime, '_');
> > > + printf(" (%%%lld)\n", (task->runtime * 100) / total_time);
> >
> > Is there a reason for using the CPU-specific runtime for the value and
> > the total runtime for the percentage?
> >
> > I expected the percentage to be the percentage of this CPU's time spend
> > running the task.
>
> We modify it so that each CPU has the same run time, unless there's missed
> events at the start (later patches), and then we change total_time to be
> the total time of the events on the CPU and not the entire trace.
I think we're talking about different things here, I probably wasn't
entirely clear about this. It's the numerator of this division that I'm
concerned about and I wonder if this should be:
(cpu_tasks[i]->runtime * 100) / total_time
If total_time is 10 seconds and there's a task A which runs on CPU0 for
2 seconds and CPU1 for 1 second then I expect to see:
CPU 0
A 2.000 (20%)
CPU 1
A 1.000 (10%)
But at the moment both of those lines will give 30% (although the actual
run times are correct).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-26 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-24 2:57 [PATCH 00/12] trace-cmd: Add trace-cmd analyze command Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 01/12] trace-cmd: Add trace-cmd analyze Steven Rostedt
2022-03-28 16:08 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-03-28 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 02/12] trace-cmd analyze: Show what tasks are running the most Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 03/12] trace-cmd analyze: Show how much tasks run on each CPU Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 19:36 ` John Keeping
2022-03-25 20:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-26 11:07 ` John Keeping [this message]
2022-03-26 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-28 16:23 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 04/12] trace-cmd analyze: Use sched_switch to find comm mappings Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 05/12] trace-cmd analyze: Use sched_switch event to update times Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 06/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add tracing of tasks and their states Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 19:37 ` John Keeping
2022-03-25 20:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 07/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add "idleness" Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 08/12] trace-cmd analyze: Track migration Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 09/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add wake up latency timings Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 19:34 ` John Keeping
2022-03-25 20:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-25 20:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-26 11:14 ` John Keeping
2022-03-26 15:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 10/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add counting of page faults Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 11/12] trace-cmd analyze: Account for dropped events Steven Rostedt
2022-03-24 2:57 ` [PATCH 12/12] trace-cmd analyze: Add documentation Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yj7z1zaDDlyHdg39@donbot \
--to=john@metanate.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=williskung@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).