* [PATCH] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run'
@ 2023-04-17 10:39 Colin Ian King
2023-04-24 9:09 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin Ian King @ 2023-04-17 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
The variable run is not initialized however it is being accumulated
by the return value from the call to ikm_run_monitor. Fix this by
replacing the += with an assignment since this is the first point
where run is being assigned.
Fixes: 4bc4b131d44c ("rv: Add rv tool")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
index e601cd9c411e..da647ad4e733 100644
--- a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
+++ b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void rv_mon(int argc, char **argv)
* Call all possible monitor implementations, looking
* for the [monitor].
*/
- run += ikm_run_monitor(monitor_name, argc-1, &argv[1]);
+ run = ikm_run_monitor(monitor_name, argc-1, &argv[1]);
if (!run)
err_msg("rv: monitor %s does not exist\n", monitor_name);
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run'
2023-04-17 10:39 [PATCH] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run' Colin Ian King
@ 2023-04-24 9:09 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira @ 2023-04-24 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin Ian King, Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On 4/17/23 12:39, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The variable run is not initialized
Oops, that is a problem, it should be initialized as 0.
however it is being accumulated
> by the return value from the call to ikm_run_monitor. Fix this by
> replacing the += with an assignment since this is the first point
> where run is being assigned.
>
> Fixes: 4bc4b131d44c ("rv: Add rv tool")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
> index e601cd9c411e..da647ad4e733 100644
> --- a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
> +++ b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void rv_mon(int argc, char **argv)
> * Call all possible monitor implementations, looking
> * for the [monitor].
> */
> - run += ikm_run_monitor(monitor_name, argc-1, &argv[1]);
> + run = ikm_run_monitor(monitor_name, argc-1, &argv[1]);
So, in the future, there will be more monitors types, and so we will check
other functions to see if they find the monitor by name. Thus, the += is correct,
what is not correct the run not being initialized.
Mind sending a patch initializing the run = 0?
Thanks!
-- Daniel
> if (!run)
> err_msg("rv: monitor %s does not exist\n", monitor_name);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run'
@ 2023-04-24 9:44 Colin Ian King
2023-04-24 9:45 ` Colin King (gmail)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin Ian King @ 2023-04-24 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
The variable run is not initialized however it is being accumulated
by the return value from the call to ikm_run_monitor. Fix this by
initializing run to zero at the start of the function.
Fixes: 4bc4b131d44c ("rv: Add rv tool")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
index e601cd9c411e..1ddb85532816 100644
--- a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
+++ b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void rv_list(int argc, char **argv)
static void rv_mon(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *monitor_name;
- int i, run;
+ int i, run = 0;
static const char *const usage[] = {
"",
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run'
2023-04-24 9:44 Colin Ian King
@ 2023-04-24 9:45 ` Colin King (gmail)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin King (gmail) @ 2023-04-24 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Steven Rostedt, linux-trace-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On 24/04/2023 10:44, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The variable run is not initialized however it is being accumulated
> by the return value from the call to ikm_run_monitor. Fix this by
> initializing run to zero at the start of the function.
>
> Fixes: 4bc4b131d44c ("rv: Add rv tool")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
> index e601cd9c411e..1ddb85532816 100644
> --- a/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
> +++ b/tools/verification/rv/src/rv.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void rv_list(int argc, char **argv)
> static void rv_mon(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> char *monitor_name;
> - int i, run;
> + int i, run = 0;
>
> static const char *const usage[] = {
> "",
Oops, I forgot the V2, will re-send as a V3. My bad.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-24 9:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-17 10:39 [PATCH] rv: Fix addition on an uninitialized variable 'run' Colin Ian King
2023-04-24 9:09 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-24 9:44 Colin Ian King
2023-04-24 9:45 ` Colin King (gmail)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).