From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: wen.yang@linux.dev
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] rv/ha: fix ha_invariant_passed_ns silent bypass of invariant check
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00f7a7c20cf8d29aa650bf7b2c5a392c15345989.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d83c7bff76922ba464d328758ec24b7bf41d4824.1783524627.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
On Wed, 2026-07-08 at 23:38 +0800, wen.yang@linux.dev wrote:
> From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
>
> When env_store is U64_MAX (its initial sentinel value),
> ha_invariant_passed_ns() returns 0 immediately without initializing
> env_store to the current clock. Subsequent calls to
> ha_check_invariant_ns() then find env_store still at U64_MAX, causing
> the elapsed comparison to wrap and always report the invariant as
> satisfied, silently masking any violations.
>
> Fix by calling ha_reset_clk_ns() to establish the guard on the first
> invocation instead of returning early. Apply the same fix to
> ha_invariant_passed_jiffy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
While this looks alright, I have something else in mind for the env variables
lifecycle. After [1] is merged, I'd like to merge [2] which is basically
inspired on your idea of resetting variables on start, just it's embedded in the
framework (and requires [1] to get rid of the double representation for env
variables).
This is probably going to happen after the next merge window.
I believe you can keep this patch for now and your model wouldn't need change
after adding [2] instead.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Gabriele
[1] -
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c0f600dcbf3d8b487c944406851a39146f4d91fa.1781847583.git.namcao@linutronix.de/
[2] -
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gmonaco/linux.git/commit/?h=rv_hybrid_automata_enq_lark&id=d7c5c40c81d9b928aa9f86c4115429bffd223a8c
> ---
> include/rv/ha_monitor.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/rv/ha_monitor.h b/include/rv/ha_monitor.h
> index 83199f90afe8..dddf5694bcc8 100644
> --- a/include/rv/ha_monitor.h
> +++ b/include/rv/ha_monitor.h
> @@ -375,12 +375,12 @@ static inline bool ha_check_invariant_ns(struct
> ha_monitor *ha_mon,
> static inline u64 ha_invariant_passed_ns(struct ha_monitor *ha_mon, enum envs
> env,
> u64 expire, u64 time_ns)
> {
> - u64 passed = 0;
> + u64 passed;
>
> if (env < 0 || env >= ENV_MAX_STORED)
> return 0;
> if (ha_monitor_env_invalid(ha_mon, env))
> - return 0;
> + ha_reset_clk_ns(ha_mon, env, time_ns);
> passed = ha_get_env(ha_mon, env, time_ns);
> ha_set_invariant_ns(ha_mon, env, expire - passed, time_ns);
> return passed;
> @@ -414,12 +414,12 @@ static inline bool ha_check_invariant_jiffy(struct
> ha_monitor *ha_mon,
> static inline u64 ha_invariant_passed_jiffy(struct ha_monitor *ha_mon, enum
> envs env,
> u64 expire, u64 time_ns)
> {
> - u64 passed = 0;
> + u64 passed;
>
> if (env < 0 || env >= ENV_MAX_STORED)
> return 0;
> if (ha_monitor_env_invalid(ha_mon, env))
> - return 0;
> + ha_reset_clk_jiffy(ha_mon, env);
> passed = ha_get_env(ha_mon, env, time_ns);
> ha_set_invariant_jiffy(ha_mon, env, expire - passed);
> return passed;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 15:38 [PATCH v4 0/8] rv/tlob: Add task latency over budget RV monitor wen.yang
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] rv/da: introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY wen.yang
2026-07-17 13:46 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-20 10:23 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] rv: add generic uprobe infrastructure for RV monitors wen.yang
2026-07-20 15:22 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] rv/tlob: add tlob model DOT file wen.yang
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] rv/ha: fix ha_invariant_passed_ns silent bypass of invariant check wen.yang
2026-07-20 11:31 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] rv/ha: make da_monitor_reset_hook and EVENT_NONE_LBL overridable wen.yang
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] rv/tlob: add tlob hybrid automaton monitor wen.yang
2026-07-20 14:49 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] rv/tlob: add KUnit tests for the tlob monitor wen.yang
2026-07-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] selftests/verification: add tlob selftests wen.yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00f7a7c20cf8d29aa650bf7b2c5a392c15345989.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox