linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>, asmadeus@codewreck.org
Cc: ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: prevent read overrun in protocol dump tracepoint
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 14:05:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1881630.VfuOzHrogK@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWq0BvPGYMTi-WfC@codewreck.org>

On Saturday, December 2, 2023 5:35:18 AM CET asmadeus@codewreck.org wrote:
> JP Kobryn wrote on Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 07:04:10PM -0800:
> > An out of bounds read can occur within the tracepoint 9p_protocol_dump().
> > In the fast assign, there is a memcpy that uses a constant size of 32
> > (macro definition as P9_PROTO_DUMP_SZ). When the copy is invoked, the
> > source buffer is not guaranteed match this size. It was found that in some
> > cases the source buffer size is less than 32, resulting in a read that
> > overruns.
> > 
> > The size of the source buffer seems to be known at the time of the
> > tracepoint being invoked. The allocations happen within p9_fcall_init(),
> > where the capacity field is set to the allocated size of the payload
> > buffer. This patch tries to fix the overrun by using the minimum of that
> > field (size of source buffer) and the size of destination buffer when
> > performing the copy.
> 
> Good catch; this is a regression due to a semi-recent optimization in
> commit 60ece0833b6c ("net/9p: allocate appropriate reduced message
> buffers")

Indeed, didn't have this one on screen! Thanks!

> For some reason I thought we rounded up small messages alloc to 4k but
> I've just confirmed we don't, so these overruns are quite frequent.
> I'll add the fixes tag and cc to stable if there's no other comment.

Yeah, in p9_msg_buf_size() [net/9p/protocol.c] the smallest allocation size
for message types known to be small (at compile-time) is hard coded to 4k.

However for all variable-size message types the size is calculated at runtime
exactly as needed for that particular message being sent. So these 9p message
types can trigger this case (<32). They are currently never rounded up.

[...]
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/9p.h b/include/trace/events/9p.h
> > index 4dfa6d7f83ba..8690a7086252 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/9p.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/9p.h
> > @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(9p_protocol_dump,
> >  		    __entry->clnt   =  clnt;
> >  		    __entry->type   =  pdu->id;
> >  		    __entry->tag    =  pdu->tag;
> > -		    memcpy(__entry->line, pdu->sdata, P9_PROTO_DUMP_SZ);
> > +		    memcpy(__entry->line, pdu->sdata,
> > +				min(pdu->capacity, P9_PROTO_DUMP_SZ));
> >  		    ),
> >  	    TP_printk("clnt %lu %s(tag = %d)\n%.3x: %16ph\n%.3x: %16ph\n",
> >  		      (unsigned long)__entry->clnt, show_9p_op(__entry->type),

AFAICS __entry is a local variable on stack, and array __entry->line not
intialized with zeros, i.e. the dump would contain trash at the end. Maybe
prepending memset() before memcpy()?

/Christian



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-02 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-02  3:04 [PATCH] 9p: prevent read overrun in protocol dump tracepoint JP Kobryn
2023-12-02  4:35 ` asmadeus
2023-12-02  7:19   ` asmadeus
2023-12-02 13:05   ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2023-12-03  1:14     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-03  1:33       ` Dominique Martinet
2023-12-03  4:15         ` Steven Rostedt
2023-12-03  5:32           ` Dominique Martinet
2023-12-04 16:20             ` JP Kobryn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1881630.VfuOzHrogK@silver \
    --to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).