From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Primiano Tucci <primiano@google.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 111/181] tracing/ring-buffer: Have polling block on watermark
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:51:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123084607.133909424@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123084602.707860461@linuxfoundation.org>
From: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
commit 42fb0a1e84ff525ebe560e2baf9451ab69127e2b upstream.
Currently the way polling works on the ring buffer is broken. It will
return immediately if there's any data in the ring buffer whereas a read
will block until the watermark (defined by the tracefs buffer_percent file)
is hit.
That is, a select() or poll() will return as if there's data available,
but then the following read will block. This is broken for the way
select()s and poll()s are supposed to work.
Have the polling on the ring buffer also block the same way reads and
splice does on the ring buffer.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221020231427.41be3f26@gandalf.local.home
Cc: Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Primiano Tucci <primiano@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1e0d6714aceb7 ("ring-buffer: Do not wake up a splice waiter when page is not full")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/ring_buffer.h | 2 -
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 -
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
+++ b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ __ring_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size,
int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full);
__poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
- struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table);
+ struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table, int full);
void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu);
#define RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS -1
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -871,6 +871,21 @@ size_t ring_buffer_nr_dirty_pages(struct
return cnt - read;
}
+static __always_inline bool full_hit(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
+{
+ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
+ size_t nr_pages;
+ size_t dirty;
+
+ nr_pages = cpu_buffer->nr_pages;
+ if (!nr_pages || !full)
+ return true;
+
+ dirty = ring_buffer_nr_dirty_pages(buffer, cpu);
+
+ return (dirty * 100) > (full * nr_pages);
+}
+
/*
* rb_wake_up_waiters - wake up tasks waiting for ring buffer input
*
@@ -1010,22 +1025,20 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer
!ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, cpu)) {
unsigned long flags;
bool pagebusy;
- size_t nr_pages;
- size_t dirty;
+ bool done;
if (!full)
break;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
pagebusy = cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page;
- nr_pages = cpu_buffer->nr_pages;
- dirty = ring_buffer_nr_dirty_pages(buffer, cpu);
+ done = !pagebusy && full_hit(buffer, cpu, full);
+
if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
- if (!pagebusy &&
- (!nr_pages || (dirty * 100) > full * nr_pages))
+ if (done)
break;
}
@@ -1051,6 +1064,7 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer
* @cpu: the cpu buffer to wait on
* @filp: the file descriptor
* @poll_table: The poll descriptor
+ * @full: wait until the percentage of pages are available, if @cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS
*
* If @cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS then the task will wake up as soon
* as data is added to any of the @buffer's cpu buffers. Otherwise
@@ -1060,14 +1074,15 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer
* zero otherwise.
*/
__poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
- struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table)
+ struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table, int full)
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
struct rb_irq_work *work;
- if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
+ if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
work = &buffer->irq_work;
- else {
+ full = 0;
+ } else {
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1075,8 +1090,14 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct tr
work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
}
- poll_wait(filp, &work->waiters, poll_table);
- work->waiters_pending = true;
+ if (full) {
+ poll_wait(filp, &work->full_waiters, poll_table);
+ work->full_waiters_pending = true;
+ } else {
+ poll_wait(filp, &work->waiters, poll_table);
+ work->waiters_pending = true;
+ }
+
/*
* There's a tight race between setting the waiters_pending and
* checking if the ring buffer is empty. Once the waiters_pending bit
@@ -1092,6 +1113,9 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct tr
*/
smp_mb();
+ if (full)
+ return full_hit(buffer, cpu, full) ? EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM : 0;
+
if ((cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty(buffer)) ||
(cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, cpu)))
return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
@@ -3112,10 +3136,6 @@ static void rb_commit(struct ring_buffer
static __always_inline void
rb_wakeups(struct trace_buffer *buffer, struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
{
- size_t nr_pages;
- size_t dirty;
- size_t full;
-
if (buffer->irq_work.waiters_pending) {
buffer->irq_work.waiters_pending = false;
/* irq_work_queue() supplies it's own memory barriers */
@@ -3139,10 +3159,7 @@ rb_wakeups(struct trace_buffer *buffer,
cpu_buffer->last_pages_touch = local_read(&cpu_buffer->pages_touched);
- full = cpu_buffer->shortest_full;
- nr_pages = cpu_buffer->nr_pages;
- dirty = ring_buffer_nr_dirty_pages(buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu);
- if (full && nr_pages && (dirty * 100) <= full * nr_pages)
+ if (!full_hit(buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu, cpu_buffer->shortest_full))
return;
cpu_buffer->irq_work.wakeup_full = true;
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6655,7 +6655,7 @@ trace_poll(struct trace_iterator *iter,
return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
else
return ring_buffer_poll_wait(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file,
- filp, poll_table);
+ filp, poll_table, iter->tr->buffer_percent);
}
static __poll_t
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221123084602.707860461@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-11-23 8:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-11-23 8:51 ` [PATCH 5.15 114/181] tracing: Fix race where eprobes can be called before the event Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221123084607.133909424@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=primiano@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).