From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Primiano Tucci <primiano@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4] tracing/ring-buffer: Only do full wait when cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:15:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221216091533.6a74d5c5@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221216134241.81381-1-ptyadav@amazon.de>
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:42:41 +0100
Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de> wrote:
> full_hit() directly uses cpu as an array index. Since
> RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS == -1, calling full_hit() with cpu ==
> RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS will cause an invalid memory access.
>
> The upstream commit 42fb0a1e84ff ("tracing/ring-buffer: Have polling
> block on watermark") already does this. This was missed when backporting
> to v5.4.y.
>
> This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis
> Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.
Nice.
>
> Fixes: e65ac2bdda54 ("tracing/ring-buffer: Have polling block on watermark")
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
> ---
>
> I am not familiar with this code. This was just pointed out by our
> static analysis tool and I wrote a quick patch fixing this. Only
> compile-tested.
>
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 176d858903bd..11e8189dd8ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -727,6 +727,7 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
>
> if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
> work = &buffer->irq_work;
> + full = 0;
Good catch. This was indeed missed in the backport. The backported patch
even added the comment:
* @full: wait until the percentage of pages are available, if @cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS
Greg, please take this patch.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Thanks,
-- Steve
> } else {
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.38.1
>
>
>
>
> Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
> Krausenstr. 38
> 10117 Berlin
> Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
> Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
> Sitz: Berlin
> Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-16 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-16 13:42 [PATCH 5.4] tracing/ring-buffer: Only do full wait when cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-16 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2022-12-19 12:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221216091533.6a74d5c5@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=primiano@google.com \
--cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).