From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF10C54EBC for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 21:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233762AbjAHV0p (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 16:26:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230211AbjAHV0o (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2023 16:26:44 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B846158; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 13:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816E5B80C68; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 21:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B4D2C433EF; Sun, 8 Jan 2023 21:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 16:26:39 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" Cc: Quanfa Fu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/eprobe: Replace kzalloc with kmalloc Message-ID: <20230108162639.6583df9f@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20230108010124.96e4ceb68b8dfb8e291f501d@kernel.org> References: <20230107034557.1156022-1-quanfafu@gmail.com> <20230108010124.96e4ceb68b8dfb8e291f501d@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 01:01:24 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > Ah, good catch. I didn't notice that snprintf() doesn't return > error code. (I confirmed that the linux internal snprintf() also > doesn't return the error code) > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) I replied to to the first instance of this patch ;-) https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230108162222.146d136f@rorschach.local.home/ -- Steve