From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77033C54EBD for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234576AbjAJA3K (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 19:29:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230233AbjAJA3J (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 19:29:09 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC9B3E0CB; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BB29B80FA1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30FE3C433EF; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:29:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673310546; bh=nlwMVqdfyfWGqSrdKjFN0jOOqL7rpv3P5eTI+FHk55U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kLuxQz7M66TCkH49qiE6uAu7QyKYieIVc/O/dN943nh0Wt1VOvPareWYsew9btg5c 1/aKQCgJpbRkEqjWfoPjAAQDeTeQDffrOB2gJWhsk8tXm0Vh3ihu9T3fRzgh99TGO6 jhWGqxc0/3gAUkLzbFuGBQcvNQA4rYFAKAmb0gefuYKt7tW+R6BOx5u6jtzCX33VNB qNZYPYRbZ/2wSFFMRXGIVpVfCPPDUqOXh3zrl9FEVA49iaSQhDNA/FPZuDhpB0QpRJ A5stgSB3NCQFKbqs2DuRarWKW6oBSyELmTavmI8w4dhi9MukVsjBahE3eVBDyrLGhl aXPII9JJoqUxA== Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 09:29:03 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Quanfa Fu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing/eprobe: no need to check for negative ret value for snprintf Message-Id: <20230110092903.e499c42d9a3c443c20419c70@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230109101226.7f75fc0e@gandalf.local.home> References: <20230109040625.3259642-1-quanfafu@gmail.com> <20230109235913.8ac99d54cff8b7c3fc5dcfa4@kernel.org> <20230109101226.7f75fc0e@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:12:26 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:59:13 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:06:25 +0800 > > Quanfa Fu wrote: > > > > > No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the > > > code does not return negative values. > > > > > > > Thanks for simplifying, this looks good to me. > > > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) > > Masami, do you want to take it into the probes branch, or do you want me to > take it into the tracing branch? Yes, I'll take it to probe/for-next. Thank you! > > -- Steve > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google)