From: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
To: <rostedt@goodmis.org>, <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] tracing/ring-buffer: Drop inappropriate WARN in rb_set_head_page()
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 11:47:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230301034702.3449755-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com> (raw)
Following WARNING appears several times during test on v5.10 but
mainline kernel should have the same problem. However I currently
can't find the reproduction method.
WARNING: CPU: 29 PID: 686834 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:1357
rb_set_head_page+0x168/0x264
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c?h=linux-5.10.y#n1357
Call trace:
rb_set_head_page+0x168/0x264
rb_per_cpu_empty+0x34/0x15c
ring_buffer_empty_cpu.part.0.isra.0+0x1a4/0x3f0
ring_buffer_empty_cpu+0x74/0xb4
__find_next_entry+0x14c/0x2f4
trace_find_next_entry_inc+0x48/0x13c
tracing_read_pipe+0x2c8/0x6b4
vfs_read+0x144/0x324
ksys_read+0x104/0x220
__arm64_sys_read+0x54/0x70
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xd8/0x37c
do_el0_svc+0x50/0x120
el0_svc+0x24/0x3c
el0_sync_handler+0x17c/0x180
el0_sync+0x160/0x180
The WARNING appears because rb_set_head_page() didn't grab the header
after three loops traversing buffer pages. This was not considered
to be expected, as comment said, writer possibly moves the header in
one loop.
However, supposing writer keeps moving the header, we may miss more
loops and it seems normal not to grab the header within three loops
in rb_set_head_page(). Therefore drop that RB_WARN_ON().
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index af50d931b020..cbfa306570d3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1471,9 +1471,7 @@ rb_set_head_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
page = head = cpu_buffer->head_page;
/*
* It is possible that the writer moves the header behind
- * where we started, and we miss in one loop.
- * A second loop should grab the header, but we'll do
- * three loops just because I'm paranoid.
+ * where we started, so we try three loops to grab the header.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
do {
@@ -1485,8 +1483,6 @@ rb_set_head_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
} while (page != head);
}
- RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, 1);
-
return NULL;
}
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 3:47 Zheng Yejian [this message]
2023-03-01 14:46 ` [RFC PATCH] tracing/ring-buffer: Drop inappropriate WARN in rb_set_head_page() Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230301034702.3449755-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com \
--to=zhengyejian1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox