From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C76C77B6F for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230102AbjDKQsr (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:48:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56312 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230093AbjDKQsb (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:48:31 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70C95590; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8282060DF2; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85416C433D2; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:48:26 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Tze-nan Wu Cc: , , , , , , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , "Paul E. McKenney" , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ring-buffer: Prevent inconsistent operation on cpu_buffer->resize_disabled Message-ID: <20230411124826.04d19759@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20230411124403.2a31e12d@gandalf.local.home> References: <20230409024616.31099-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com> <20230410073512.13362-1-Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com> <20230411124403.2a31e12d@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:44:03 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > Please have each new patch be a new thread, and not a Cc to the previous Should have been "reply to the previous" :-p -- Steve > version of the patch. As it makes it hard to find in INBOXs.