From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] tracing: Add the comment for allowing one single recursion in process context
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:47:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417154737.12740-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417154737.12740-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
After TRACE_CTX_TRANSITION is applied, it will allow one single recursion
in the process context. Below is an example,
SEC("fentry/htab_map_delete_elem")
int BPF_PROG(on_delete, struct bpf_map *map)
{
pass2++;
bpf_map_delete_elem(&hash2, &key);
return 0;
}
In the above test case, the recursion will be detected at the second
bpf_map_delete_elem() call in this prog. Illustrated as follows,
SEC("fentry/htab_map_delete_elem")
pass2++; <<<< Turn out to be 1 after this operation.
bpf_map_delete_elem(&hash2, &key);
SEC("fentry/htab_map_delete_elem") <<<< no recursion
pass2++; <<<< Turn out to be 2 after this operation.
bpf_map_delete_elem(&hash2, &key);
SEC("fentry/htab_map_delete_elem") <<<< RECURSION
We'd better explain this behavior explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/linux/trace_recursion.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
index 80de2ee..445a055 100644
--- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
+++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ static __always_inline int trace_test_and_set_recursion(unsigned long ip, unsign
* will think a recursion occurred, and the event will be dropped.
* Let a single instance happen via the TRANSITION_BIT to
* not drop those events.
+ * After this rule is applied, one single recursion is allowed in
+ * the process context.
*/
bit = TRACE_CTX_TRANSITION + start;
if (val & (1 << bit)) {
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 15:47 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Tracing recursion prevention mechanism improvement Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Add __rcu_read_{lock,unlock} into btf id deny list Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] tracing: Add generic test_recursion_try_acquire() Yafang Shao
2023-04-20 6:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-04-17 15:47 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Allow one single recursion in fentry recursion test Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Improve tracing recursion prevention mechanism Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 20:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-18 1:49 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-18 15:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-19 11:46 ` Yafang Shao
[not found] ` <CAADnVQ+FO-+1OALTtgVkcpH3Adc6xS9qjzORyq2vwVtwY2UoxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2023-04-24 21:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27 9:57 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 12:15 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 12:35 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 23:29 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-27 13:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27 14:22 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 15:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27 15:23 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 15:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27 15:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-27 15:43 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 15:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] bpf: Remove some denied functions from the btf id deny list Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230417154737.12740-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).