From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88276C7618E for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 01:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230327AbjDYBlY (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229637AbjDYBlX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:23 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C88AF04; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 18:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9E962074; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 01:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A26C3C433EF; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 01:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:18 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Beau Belgrave Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, dcook@linux.microsoft.com, alanau@linux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/user_events: Prevent same address and bit per process Message-ID: <20230424214118.06b7ee07@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20230411211709.15018-4-beaub@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20230411211709.15018-1-beaub@linux.microsoft.com> <20230411211709.15018-4-beaub@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:17:09 -0700 Beau Belgrave wrote: > +static bool user_event_enabler_exists(struct user_event_mm *mm, > + unsigned long uaddr, unsigned char bit) > +{ > + struct user_event_enabler *enabler; > + struct user_event_enabler *next; > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe(enabler, next, &mm->enablers, link) > + if (enabler->addr == uaddr && > + (enabler->values & ENABLE_VAL_BIT_MASK) == bit) > + return true; > + Please add brackets around complex calls like the above. The no bracket rule is not if you can get away without using it, but if there's only a single line. list_for_each_entry_safe(enabler, next, &mm->enablers, link) { if (enabler->addr == uaddr && (enabler->values & ENABLE_VAL_BIT_MASK) == bit) return true; } -- Steve > + return false; > +} > +