linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Improve tracing recursion prevention mechanism
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:18:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230427111842.2e40fe3c@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALOAHbBX1C-eg93Hf3xPLsdsaBzoGn1pHh9jb3Z_-T-7HD60wA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:22:22 +0800
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:

> IIUC, the acquire/release pair works as follows,
> 
>    test_recursion_try_acquire
>      [ protection area ]
>    test_recursion_release
> 
> After release, there will be no protection, and thus it will fail the
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c[1] test case, because
> the recursion occurs in the bpf_prog_run() itself,

But bpf programs are allowed to recurs. Hence, you need separate logic to
detect that. The test_recursion_*() code is for cases that are not allowed
to recurs.

> 
>   __bpf_prog_enter
>      test_recursion_try_acquire
>      [...]
>      test_recursion_release
>   // no protection after the release
>   bpf_prog_run()
>     bpf_prog_run() // the recursion can't be prevented.

But I thought you can run a bpf_prog from another bpf_prog. So you don't
want to prevent it. You need other logic to detect if it was not suppose to
recurs.

-- Steve


>         __bpf_prog_enter
>             test_recursion_try_acquire
>             [...]
>             test_recursion_release
>        bpf_prog_run()
>            bpf_prog_run()
>                __bpf_prog_enter
>                   test_recursion_try_acquire
>                   [...]
>                   test_recursion_release
>               bpf_prog_run()
>               [ And so on ... ]
> 
> [1]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c#n38

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 15:47 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Tracing recursion prevention mechanism improvement Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Add __rcu_read_{lock,unlock} into btf id deny list Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] tracing: Add generic test_recursion_try_acquire() Yafang Shao
2023-04-20  6:51   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] tracing: Add the comment for allowing one single recursion in process context Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Allow one single recursion in fentry recursion test Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Improve tracing recursion prevention mechanism Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 20:14   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-18  1:49     ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-18 15:38       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-19 11:46         ` Yafang Shao
     [not found]           ` <CAADnVQ+FO-+1OALTtgVkcpH3Adc6xS9qjzORyq2vwVtwY2UoxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2023-04-24 21:40             ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27  9:57               ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 12:15                 ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 12:35                   ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-17 23:29   ` kernel test robot
2023-04-27 13:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27 14:22     ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 15:18       ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-04-27 15:23         ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 15:36           ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-27 15:39             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-27 15:43               ` Yafang Shao
2023-04-27 15:46                 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-04-17 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] bpf: Remove some denied functions from the btf id deny list Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230427111842.2e40fe3c@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).