From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/user_events: Run BPF program if attached
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 16:30:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509163050.127d5123@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230509130111.62d587f1@rorschach.local.home>
On Tue, 9 May 2023 13:01:11 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > I see no practical use case for bpf progs to be connected to user events.
>
> That's not a technical reason. Obviously they have a use case.
Alexei,
It was great having a chat with you during lunch at LSFMM/BPF!
Looking forward to your technical response that I believe are
legitimate requests. I'm replying here, as during our conversation, you
had the misperception that the user events had a system call when the
event was disabled. I told you I will point out the code that shows
that the kernel sets the bit, and that user space does not do a system
call when the event is disable.
From the user space side, which does:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/samples/user_events/example.c#n60
/* Check if anyone is listening */
if (enabled) {
/* Yep, trace out our data */
writev(data_fd, (const struct iovec *)io, 2);
/* Increase the count */
count++;
printf("Something was attached, wrote data\n");
}
Where it told the kernel about that "enabled" variable:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/samples/user_events/example.c#n47
if (event_reg(data_fd, "test u32 count", &write, &enabled) == -1)
return errno;
static int event_reg(int fd, const char *command, int *write, int *enabled)
{
struct user_reg reg = {0};
reg.size = sizeof(reg);
reg.enable_bit = 31;
reg.enable_size = sizeof(*enabled);
reg.enable_addr = (__u64)enabled;
reg.name_args = (__u64)command;
if (ioctl(fd, DIAG_IOCSREG, ®) == -1)
return -1;
*write = reg.write_index;
return 0;
}
The above will add a trace event into tracefs. When someone does:
# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/user_events/test/enable
The kernel will trigger the class->reg function, defined by:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c#n1804
user->class.reg = user_event_reg;
Which calls:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c#n1555
update_enable_bit_for(user);
Which does:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c#n1465
update_enable_bit_for() {
[..]
user_event_enabler_update(user);
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c#n451
user_event_enabler_update() {
[..]
user_event_enabler_write(mm, enabler, true, &attempt);
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c#n385
static int user_event_enabler_write(struct user_event_mm *mm,
struct user_event_enabler *enabler,
bool fixup_fault, int *attempt)
{
unsigned long uaddr = enabler->addr;
unsigned long *ptr;
struct page *page;
void *kaddr;
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&event_mutex);
mmap_assert_locked(mm->mm);
*attempt += 1;
/* Ensure MM has tasks, cannot use after exit_mm() */
if (refcount_read(&mm->tasks) == 0)
return -ENOENT;
if (unlikely(test_bit(ENABLE_VAL_FAULTING_BIT, ENABLE_BITOPS(enabler)) ||
test_bit(ENABLE_VAL_FREEING_BIT, ENABLE_BITOPS(enabler))))
return -EBUSY;
ret = pin_user_pages_remote(mm->mm, uaddr, 1, FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_NOFAULT,
&page, NULL, NULL);
if (unlikely(ret <= 0)) {
if (!fixup_fault)
return -EFAULT;
if (!user_event_enabler_queue_fault(mm, enabler, *attempt))
pr_warn("user_events: Unable to queue fault handler\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
kaddr = kmap_local_page(page);
ptr = kaddr + (uaddr & ~PAGE_MASK);
/* Update bit atomically, user tracers must be atomic as well */
if (enabler->event && enabler->event->status)
set_bit(enabler->values & ENABLE_VAL_BIT_MASK, ptr);
else
clear_bit(enabler->values & ENABLE_VAL_BIT_MASK, ptr);
kunmap_local(kaddr);
unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, true);
return 0;
}
The above maps the user space address and then sets the bit that was
registered.
That is, it changes "enabled" to true, and the if statement:
if (enabled) {
/* Yep, trace out our data */
writev(data_fd, (const struct iovec *)io, 2);
/* Increase the count */
count++;
printf("Something was attached, wrote data\n");
}
Is now executed.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-08 16:37 [PATCH] tracing/user_events: Run BPF program if attached Beau Belgrave
2023-05-09 15:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-09 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-09 20:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-05-09 20:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-15 16:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-15 18:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-15 19:35 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-15 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-15 19:24 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-15 21:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-17 0:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-17 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 1:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 2:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-17 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 17:22 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-17 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 19:07 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-17 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 19:36 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-17 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 23:00 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-17 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 23:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-18 0:14 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-18 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-17 1:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-17 16:50 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-18 0:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-18 0:19 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-18 0:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-18 1:18 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-05-18 2:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-18 3:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-18 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-18 17:28 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-06-01 9:46 ` Christian Brauner
2023-06-01 15:24 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-06-01 15:57 ` Christian Brauner
2023-06-01 16:29 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-06-06 13:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-06-06 17:05 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-06-07 14:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-06-07 19:26 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-06-08 0:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-17 17:51 ` Beau Belgrave
2023-06-06 13:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-06-06 16:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06 20:57 ` Beau Belgrave
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230509163050.127d5123@rorschach.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).